Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 5: advanced analytic methods.
Pigott, Terri; Noyes, Jane; Umscheid, Craig A; Myers, Evan; Morton, Sally C; Fu, Rongwei; Sanders-Schmidler, Gillian D; Devine, Beth; Murad, M Hassan; Kelly, Michael P; Fonnesbeck, Christopher; Kahwati, Leila; Beretvas, S Natasha.
Afiliación
  • Pigott T; Office of Research Services, Loyola University Chicago, 6439 N. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA. Electronic address: tpigott@luc.edu.
  • Noyes J; School of Social Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, UK.
  • Umscheid CA; ECRI Institute-Penn Medicine AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Myers E; Duke Evidence-based Practice Center, Duke University, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
  • Morton SC; College of Science, Virginia Tech, North End Center, Suite 4300, 300 Turner Street NW, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
  • Fu R; Pacific-Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Sanders-Schmidler GD; Duke Evidence-based Practice Center, Duke University, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
  • Devine B; Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195-7630, USA.
  • Murad MH; Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Kelly MP; Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Fonnesbeck C; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
  • Kahwati L; RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Hobbs 139 P.O. Box 12194, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
  • Beretvas SN; Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 90: 37-42, 2017 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28720512
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Advanced analytic methods for synthesizing evidence about complex interventions continue to be developed. In this paper, we emphasize that the specific research question posed in the review should be used as a guide for choosing the appropriate analytic method.

METHODS:

We present advanced analytic approaches that address four common questions that guide reviews of complex

interventions:

(1) How effective is the intervention? (2) For whom does the intervention work and in what contexts? (3) What happens when the intervention is implemented? and (4) What decisions are possible given the results of the synthesis?

CONCLUSION:

The analytic approaches presented in this paper are particularly useful when each primary study differs in components, mechanisms of action, context, implementation, timing, and many other domains.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Literatura de Revisión como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Literatura de Revisión como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article