Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making.
Berger, Marc L; Sox, Harold; Willke, Richard J; Brixner, Diana L; Eichler, Hans-Georg; Goettsch, Wim; Madigan, David; Makady, Amr; Schneeweiss, Sebastian; Tarricone, Rosanna; Wang, Shirley V; Watkins, John; Mullins, C Daniel.
Afiliación
  • Berger ML; New York City, NY, USA. Electronic address: mlberger301@gmail.com.
  • Sox H; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Willke RJ; International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
  • Brixner DL; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Eichler HG; European Medicines Agency, London, UK.
  • Goettsch W; Zorginstituut Nederland and University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Madigan D; Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
  • Makady A; Zorginstituut Nederland and University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Schneeweiss S; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Tarricone R; Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
  • Wang SV; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Watkins J; Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA.
  • Mullins CD; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Value Health ; 20(8): 1003-1008, 2017 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28964430
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Real-world evidence (RWE) includes data from retrospective or prospective observational studies and observational registries and provides insights beyond those addressed by randomized controlled trials. RWE studies aim to improve health care decision making.

METHODS:

The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) created a task force to make recommendations regarding good procedural practices that would enhance decision makers' confidence in evidence derived from RWD studies. Peer review by ISPOR/ISPE members and task force participants provided a consensus-building iterative process for the topics and framing of recommendations.

RESULTS:

The ISPOR/ISPE Task Force recommendations cover seven topics such as study registration, replicability, and stakeholder involvement in RWE studies. These recommendations, in concert with earlier recommendations about study methodology, provide a trustworthy foundation for the expanded use of RWE in health care decision making.

CONCLUSION:

The focus of these recommendations is good procedural practices for studies that test a specific hypothesis in a specific population. We recognize that some of the recommendations in this report may not be widely adopted without appropriate incentives from decision makers, journal editors, and other key stakeholders.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Toma de Decisiones / Atención a la Salud / Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Toma de Decisiones / Atención a la Salud / Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article