Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
OV21/PETROC: a randomized Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup phase II study of intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Provencher, D M; Gallagher, C J; Parulekar, W R; Ledermann, J A; Armstrong, D K; Brundage, M; Gourley, C; Romero, I; Gonzalez-Martin, A; Feeney, M; Bessette, P; Hall, M; Weberpals, J I; Hall, G; Lau, S K; Gauthier, P; Fung-Kee-Fung, M; Eisenhauer, E A; Winch, C; Tu, D; MacKay, H J.
Afiliación
  • Provencher DM; Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
  • Gallagher CJ; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Parulekar WR; Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
  • Ledermann JA; University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
  • Armstrong DK; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
  • Brundage M; Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, Canada.
  • Gourley C; Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Romero I; Secretaria del Área Clínica de Oncología Ginecológica, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, València.
  • Gonzalez-Martin A; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
  • Feeney M; University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
  • Bessette P; Gynecologic Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Sherbrooke, Canada.
  • Hall M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
  • Weberpals JI; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Hall G; Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
  • Lau SK; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
  • Gauthier P; Gynecologic Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Sherbrooke, Canada.
  • Fung-Kee-Fung M; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Eisenhauer EA; Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
  • Winch C; Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
  • Tu D; Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG), Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
  • MacKay HJ; Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: helen.mackay@sunnybrook.ca.
Ann Oncol ; 29(2): 431-438, 2018 02 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29186319
ABSTRACT

Background:

The purpose of this multistage, adaptively, designed randomized phase II study was to evaluate the role of intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and optimal debulking surgery in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and

methods:

We carried out a multicenter, two-stage, phase II trial. Eligible patients with stage IIB-IVA EOC treated with platinum-based intravenous (i.v.) NACT followed by optimal (<1 cm) debulking surgery were randomized to one of the three treatment arms (i) i.v. carboplatin/paclitaxel, (ii) i.p. cisplatin plus i.v./i.p. paclitaxel, or (iii) i.p. carboplatin plus i.v./i.p. paclitaxel. The primary end point was 9-month progressive disease rate (PD9). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

Results:

Between 2009 and 2015, 275 patients were randomized; i.p. cisplatin containing arm did not progress beyond the first stage of the study after failing to meet the pre-set superiority rule. The final analysis compared i.v. carboplatin/paclitaxel (n = 101) with i.p. carboplatin, i.v./i.p. paclitaxel (n = 102). The intention to treat PD9 was lower in the i.p. carboplatin arm compared with the i.v. carboplatin arm 24.5% (95% CI 16.2% to 32.9%) versus 38.6% (95% CI 29.1% to 48.1%) P = 0.065. The study was underpowered to detect differences in PFS HR PFS 0.82 (95% CI 0.57-1.17); P = 0.27 and OS HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.47-1.35) P = 0.40. The i.p. carboplatin-based regimen was well tolerated with no reduction in QOL or increase in toxicity compared with i.v. administration alone.

Conclusion:

In women with stage IIIC or IVA EOC treated with NACT and optimal debulking surgery, i.p. carboplatin-based chemotherapy is well tolerated and associated with an improved PD9 compared with i.v. carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Clinical trial number clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01622543.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Quimioterapia Adyuvante / Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Quimioterapia Adyuvante / Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá