Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mucosal advancement flap for recurrent complex anal fistula: a repeatable procedure.
Podetta, Michele; Scarpa, Cosimo Riccardo; Zufferey, Guillaume; Skala, Karel; Ris, Frederic; Roche, Bruno; Buchs, Nicolas Christian.
Afiliación
  • Podetta M; Proctology Unit, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland. michelepodetta@gmail.com.
  • Scarpa CR; Département de Chirurgie, Division de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. michelepodetta@gmail.com.
  • Zufferey G; Proctology Unit, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Skala K; Proctology Unit, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Ris F; Proctology Unit, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Roche B; Proctology Unit, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Buchs NC; Proctology Unit, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 34(1): 197-200, 2019 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30187157
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) is the best option for complex anal fistula (AF) treatment. Recurrence is not rare and the best surgical option for his handling is a challenge considering the incontinence risk and the healing rate. We aimed to determine the feasibility and outcomes of a second MAF for recurrent complex AF previously treated with mucosal advancement flap.

METHODS:

We retrospectively identified 32 patients undergoing two or more MAF for recurrent AF in a larger cohort of 121 consecutive cases of MAF operated by the same senior colorectal surgeon. Only complex AF of cryptoglandular origin was enrolled. A long-term follow-up was performed collecting clinical and functional data.

RESULTS:

Among 121 patients (group A) treated with mucosal advancement flap, 32 (26.4%) (group B) recurred with a complex AF requiring a second mucosal advancement flap procedure. Success rate of group B is 78.1%. Six patients of group B recurred a second time, another MAF was performed with healing in all cases. Complication rate (Clavien Dindo 3b) of group B is 9.4% compared to 8.3% of group A. A slight continence deficit (Miller score 1, 2, and 4) was detected after the first MAF in 3 patients. The Miller score for these patients did not change after the subsequent MAF.

CONCLUSIONS:

MAF is effective for treatment of complex recurrent AF. A pre-existing MAF procedure does not worsen the healing rate of the second flap. The rate of surgical complications is similar with those reported in the literature for MAFs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Fístula Rectal / Membrana Mucosa Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Fístula Rectal / Membrana Mucosa Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza