Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quadriceps Strength Deficits After a Femoral Nerve Block Versus Adductor Canal Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Trial.
Runner, Robert P; Boden, Stephanie A; Godfrey, William S; Premkumar, Ajay; Samady, Heather; Gottschalk, Michael B; Xerogeanes, John W.
Afiliación
  • Runner RP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Boden SA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Godfrey WS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Premkumar A; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
  • Samady H; Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Gottschalk MB; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Xerogeanes JW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 6(9): 2325967118797990, 2018 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30276220
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Peripheral nerve blocks, particularly femoral nerve blocks (FNBs), are commonly performed for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, associated quadriceps muscle weakness after FNBs is well described and may occur for up to 6 months postoperatively. The adductor canal block (ACB) has emerged as a viable alternative to the FNB, theoretically causing less quadriceps weakness during the immediate postoperative period, as it bypasses the majority of the motor fibers of the femoral nerve that branch off proximal to the adductor canal. PURPOSE/

HYPOTHESIS:

This study sought to identify if a difference in quadriceps strength exists after an ACB or FNB for ACL reconstruction beyond the immediate postoperative period. Beyond the immediate postoperative period, we anticipated no difference in quadriceps strength between patients who received ACBs or FNBs for ACL reconstruction. STUDY

DESIGN:

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS:

A total of 102 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a variety of graft types were enrolled between November 2015 and April 2016. All patients were randomized to receive an ACB or FNB before surgery, and the surgeon was blinded to the block type. All patients underwent aggressive rehabilitation without functional bracing postoperatively. The time to the first straight-leg raise was reported by the patient. Isokinetic strength testing was performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS:

Data for 73 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in patient demographics of age, body mass index, sex, or tourniquet time between the FNB (n = 35) and ACB (n = 38) groups. The mean time to the first straight-leg raise was similar, at 13.1 ± 1.0 hours for the FNB group and 15.5 ± 1.2 hours for the ACB group (P = .134). The mean extension torque at 60 deg/s increased significantly for both the ACB (53.7% ± 3.4% to 68.3% ± 2.9%; P = .008) and the FNB (53.3% ± 3.3% to 68.5% ± 4.1%; P = .006) groups from 3 to 6 months postoperatively. There was also no significant difference in mean extension torque at 60 deg/s or 180 deg/s between the FNB and ACB groups at 3 and 6 months. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (infection, arthrofibrosis, retear) between groups.

CONCLUSION:

Although prior studies have shown immediate postoperative benefits of ACBs compared with FNBs, with a faster return of quadriceps strength, in the current study there was no statistically or clinically significant difference in quadriceps strength at 3 and 6 months postoperatively in patients who received ACBs or FNBs for ACL reconstruction.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos