Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A new method of mark detection for software-based optical mark recognition.
Loke, Seng Cheong; Kasmiran, Khairul A; Haron, Sharifah A.
Afiliación
  • Loke SC; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kasmiran KA; Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeing), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
  • Haron SA; Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0206420, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30412588
ABSTRACT
Software optical mark recognition (SOMR) is the process whereby information entered on a survey form or questionnaire is converted using specialized software into a machine-readable format. SOMR normally requires input fields to be completely darkened, have no internal labels, or be filled with a soft pencil, otherwise mark detection will be inaccurate. Forms can also have print and scan artefacts that further increase the error rate. This article presents a new method of mark detection that improves over existing techniques based on pixel counting and simple thresholding. Its main advantage is that it can be used under a variety of conditions and yet maintain a high level of accuracy that is sufficient for scientific applications. Field testing shows no software misclassification in 5695 samples filled by trained personnel, and only two misclassifications in 6000 samples filled by untrained respondents. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 99.73%, 99.98%, and 99.94% respectively, even in the presence of print and scan artefacts, which was superior to other methods tested. A separate direct comparison for mark detection showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy respectively of 99.7%, 100.0%, 100.0% (new method), 96.3%, 96.0%, 96.1% (pixel counting), and 99.9%, 99.8%, 99.8% (simple thresholding) on clean forms, and 100.0%, 99.1%, 99.3% (new method), 98.4%, 95.6%, 96.2% (pixel counting), 100.0%, 38.3%, 51.4% (simple thresholding) on forms with print artefacts. This method is designed for bubble and box fields, while other types such as handwriting fields require separate error control measures.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Programas Informáticos / Fenómenos Ópticos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Programas Informáticos / Fenómenos Ópticos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Zelanda