Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improved survival in rectal cancer patients who are treated with long-course versus short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy: A propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB.
Chapman, Brandon C; Goodman, Karyn; Hosokawa, Patrick; Gleisner, Ana; Cowan, Michelle L; Birnbaum, Elisa; Vogel, Jon D.
Afiliación
  • Chapman BC; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Goodman K; Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Hosokawa P; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), Aurora, Colorado.
  • Gleisner A; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Cowan ML; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Birnbaum E; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Vogel JD; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
J Surg Oncol ; 119(4): 518-531, 2019 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30637750
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated comparable survival outcomes for short-course (SCRT) and long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy (LCRT) in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS:

Using the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2015), a propensity score was used to match 188 patients with rectal cancer receiving SCRT to 376 patients receiving LCRT. Perioperative, oncologic, and survival outcomes were compared.

RESULTS:

Patient and clinical tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the LCRT were more likely to undergo surgery (91% vs 85%; P = 0.03). The LCRT group were more likely to have tumor (T) (56% vs 43%) and nodal (N) (25% vs 19%) downstaging, and a complete pathological response (15% vs 6%) compared with the SCRT group (all P < 0.05). Length of stay (6 vs 8 days), 30-day (1% vs 5%) mortality, and 90-day mortality (1% vs 10%) were significantly lower in the LCRT group (all P < 0.05). After adjusting for patient and tumor-related characteristics, LCRT was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of mortality compared with SCRT (hazard ratios, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this analysis, LCRT was superior to SCRT in terms of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, perioperative mortality, and overall survival. These findings provide evidence for the use of LCRT when neoadjuvant therapy is indicated.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Puntaje de Propensión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Puntaje de Propensión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article