Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion weighted imaging at 3.0T MR for differentiating lacrimal gland tumors].
Wang, Y Z; Xian, J F; Yang, B T; Guo, J; Wang, X Y; Song, L Y.
Afiliación
  • Wang YZ; Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 99(1): 53-56, 2019 Jan 01.
Article en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30641666
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion weighted imaging at 3.0 T MR for the differentiation in the larcrimal gland tumors. Methods: A total of 73 cases, 36 males and 37 female; mean age 14-81(44±15)years, with lacrimal gland tumors confirmed by pathology in Beijing Tongren Hospital were retrospectively analyzed between January 2011 and April 2016.All cases underwent the preoperative routine MRI and DWI scan, the ADC values were measured in region of interest within the solid zone. The cases were divided into benign and malignant group by the histopathology, according the different pathological categories, the malignant cases were further divided into the epithelial and non-epithelial malignacy. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was constructed using various cut points of ADC for different parameters to confirm the diagnostic threshold value and evaluate the diagnostic efficacy. Results: There were totally 77 lesions in 73 cases, of which 69 involved unilateral lacrimal gland,4 bilateral lacrimal glands. The mean ADC value of malignant and benign masses in lacrimal gland was (1.36±0.16) and (0.90±0.30)×10(-3) mm(2)/s respectively. There was significantly statistical difference between the both(t=-8.319, P<0.01). The mean ADC value of epithelial and non-epithelial malignacy in lacrimal gland was (1.08±0.18) and (0.54±0.09)×10(-3) mm(2)/s respectively. There was significantly statistical difference between the both(t=11.988, P<0.01). The area under the ROC for distinguishing malignant from benign lesions was 0.940. Using an ADC value of 1.275×10(-3) mm(2)/s as the threshold value, the best result obtained had a sensitivity of 94.4%(34/36), specificity of 82.9%(34/41), accuracy of 88.3%(68/77). The area under the ROC for differentiating non-epithelial from epithelial malignacy was 1.0. Using an ADC value of 0.736×10(-3) mm(2)/s as the threshold value, the best result obtained had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, accuracy of 100%. Conclusion: The ADC value is helpful in differentiation among different kinds of tumors in lacrimal masses.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética / Aparato Lagrimal Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética / Aparato Lagrimal Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China