Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Co-evolution of physical and social sciences in synthetic biology.
Trump, Benjamin D; Cegan, Jeffrey; Wells, Emily; Poinsatte-Jones, Kelsey; Rycroft, Taylor; Warner, Christopher; Martin, David; Perkins, Edward; Wood, Matthew D; Linkov, Igor.
Afiliación
  • Trump BD; a Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education , US Army Corps of Engineers, Oak Ridge , TN , USA.
  • Cegan J; b US Army Engineer Research and Development Center , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Wells E; c SOL Engineering Services, LLC , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Poinsatte-Jones K; c SOL Engineering Services, LLC , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Rycroft T; c SOL Engineering Services, LLC , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Warner C; b US Army Engineer Research and Development Center , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Martin D; b US Army Engineer Research and Development Center , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Perkins E; b US Army Engineer Research and Development Center , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Wood MD; b US Army Engineer Research and Development Center , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
  • Linkov I; b US Army Engineer Research and Development Center , Vicksburg , MS , USA.
Crit Rev Biotechnol ; 39(3): 351-365, 2019 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30727764
ABSTRACT
Emerging technologies research often covers various perspectives in disciplines and research areas ranging from hard sciences, engineering, policymaking, and sociology. However, the interrelationship between these different disciplinary domains, particularly the physical and social sciences, often occurs many years after a technology has matured and moved towards commercialization. Synthetic biology may serve an exception to this idea, where, since 2000, the physical and the social sciences communities have increasingly framed their research in response to various perspectives in biological engineering, risk assessment needs, governance challenges, and the social implications that the technology may incur. This paper reviews a broad collection of synthetic biology literature from 2000-2016, and demonstrates how the co-development of physical and social science communities has grown throughout synthetic biology's earliest stages of development. Further, this paper indicates that future co-development of synthetic biology scholarship will assist with significant challenges of the technology's risk assessment, governance, and public engagement needs, where an interdisciplinary approach is necessary to foster sustainable, risk-informed, and societally beneficial technological advances moving forward.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Política Pública / Sociología / Bioingeniería / Biología Sintética Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Biotechnol Asunto de la revista: BIOTECNOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Política Pública / Sociología / Bioingeniería / Biología Sintética Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Biotechnol Asunto de la revista: BIOTECNOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos