Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment Strategies and Survival Trends for Anorectal Melanoma: Is it Time for a Change?
Taylor, James P; Stem, Miloslawa; Yu, David; Chen, Sophia Y; Fang, Sandy H; Gearhart, Susan L; Safar, Bashar; Efron, Jonathan E.
Afiliación
  • Taylor JP; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
  • Stem M; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
  • Yu D; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
  • Chen SY; Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Canada.
  • Fang SH; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
  • Gearhart SL; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
  • Safar B; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
  • Efron JE; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Suite G-45, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
World J Surg ; 43(7): 1809-1819, 2019 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30830243
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Immunotherapy advances for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma question its efficacy in treating anorectal mucosal melanoma (ARMM). We aimed to identify the prevalence, current management, and overall survival (OS) for ARMM.

METHODS:

Review of patients with ARMM from 2004 to 2015 National Cancer Database. Factors associated with immunotherapy were identified using multivariable logistic regression. The primary outcome was 2- and 5-year OS. Subgroup analysis by treatment type was performed.

RESULTS:

A total of 1331 patients were identified with a significant increase in prevalence (2004 6.99%, 2015 10.53%). ARMM patients were older, white, on Medicare, and from the South. The most common treatment was surgery (48.77%), followed by surgery + radiation (11.75%), surgery + immunotherapy (8.68%), and surgery + chemotherapy (8.68%). 16.93% of patients received immunotherapy, with utilization increasing (7.24% 2004, 21.27% 2015, p < 0.001). Patients who received immunotherapy had a significantly better 2-year OS (42.47% vs. 49.21%, p < 0.001), and other therapies did not reveal a significant difference. Adjusted analysis showed no difference in 2- and 5-year OS based on therapy type.

CONCLUSION:

The prevalence of ARMM has increased. The use of immunotherapy has increased substantially. Some survival benefit with the administration of immunotherapy may exist that has yet to be revealed. A more aggressive treatment paradigm is warranted.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Ano / Neoplasias del Recto / Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos / Inmunoterapia / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Ano / Neoplasias del Recto / Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos / Inmunoterapia / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos