Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study.
Demirel, Akif; Yüksel, Burcu Nihan; Ziya, Meryem; Gümüs, Hüsniye; Dogan, Salih; Sari, Saziye.
Afiliación
  • Demirel A; a Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry , Ankara University , Ankara , Turkey.
  • Yüksel BN; a Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry , Ankara University , Ankara , Turkey.
  • Ziya M; a Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry , Ankara University , Ankara , Turkey.
  • Gümüs H; b Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry , Erciyes University , Kayseri , Turkey.
  • Dogan S; b Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry , Erciyes University , Kayseri , Turkey.
  • Sari S; a Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry , Ankara University , Ankara , Turkey.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 77(5): 380-385, 2019 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30859897
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

The study was conducted with 40 extracted maxillary primary incisor teeth divided into four groups (n = 10) as 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)+1% NaOCl, 6% citric acid (CA)+1% NaOCl, and 0.9% physiological saline (PS). After the irrigation procedures, root canal walls were examined by SEM and the efficacies of irrigation solutions in smear layer removal were scored and compared. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman and Siegel Castellan tests.

RESULTS:

The smear layer removal was found to be statistically more effective in groups of 10% EDTA + 1% NaOCl and 6% CA + 1% NaOCl when compared with the other groups (p < .05). Smear removal efficacy was statistically significantly higher in coronal and medium thirds when compared with the apical regions in the experimental groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

It was concluded that 10% EDTA + 1% NaOCl and 6% CA + 1% NaOCl could be alternative irrigation protocols regarding smear layer removal. However, due to the absence of erosive dentinal changes, it might be suggested that using 6% CA + 1% NaOCl can be recommended compared to 10% EDTA + 1% NaOCl in primary root canals.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Irrigantes del Conducto Radicular / Desinfección / Capa de Barro Dentinario / Preparación del Conducto Radicular / Cavidad Pulpar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Odontol Scand Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Irrigantes del Conducto Radicular / Desinfección / Capa de Barro Dentinario / Preparación del Conducto Radicular / Cavidad Pulpar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Odontol Scand Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía