Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study.
Parsons, Janet A; Greenspan, Nicole R; Baker, Natalie A; McKillop, Chris; Hicks, Lisa K; Chan, Olivia.
Afiliación
  • Parsons JA; Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. parsonsj@smh.ca.
  • Greenspan NR; Department of Physical Therapy and the Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave., Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada. parsonsj@smh.ca.
  • Baker NA; Toronto Public Health, 277 Victoria St., Toronto, Canada.
  • McKillop C; Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
  • Hicks LK; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
  • Chan O; Turalt, Inc., Suite 2201, 250 Yonge St., Toronto, Canada.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 264, 2019 Mar 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30909874
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study sought to develop an in-depth understanding of patients' lived experiences of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and its treatment, and to identify which features of treatment were most important to them. METHODS: Qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) were conducted with 32 people living with RRMM across Canada. In Phase 1, interviews focused on participants' accounts of their experiences with the disease and its treatment and laid the groundwork for the FGs (Phase 2). The FGs developed a deeper understanding of patients' treatment priorities. Interview and FG transcripts were coded for emergent themes and patterns. RESULTS: The interviews identified important side effects that had significant impacts on patients' lives, including physical, cognitive, and psychological/emotional side effects. Participants also identified specific treatment features (attributes) that were important to them. These were compiled into a list and used in the FGs to understand patients' priorities. Higher prioritized attributes were: life expectancy, physical and cognitive side effects, and financial impact. Mode of administration, treatment intervals, psychological side effects, and sleep/mood effects were identified as lower priorities. CONCLUSIONS: RRMM and its treatments impact importantly on patients' quality-of-life across a range of domains. Patients prioritized treatment features that could enhance life expectancy, minimize side effects and offset financial burdens. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A clear articulation of patient priorities can contribute to efforts to design treatment with patients' concerns in mind, thereby promoting a more patient-centered approach to care.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos / Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos / Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá