Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between 8- and 32-channel phased-array receive coils for in vivo hyperpolarized 13 C imaging of the human brain.
Autry, Adam W; Gordon, Jeremy W; Carvajal, Lucas; Mareyam, Azma; Chen, Hsin-Yu; Park, Ilwoo; Mammoli, Daniele; Vareth, Maryam; Chang, Susan M; Wald, Lawrence L; Xu, Duan; Vigneron, Daniel B; Nelson, Sarah J; Li, Yan.
Afiliación
  • Autry AW; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
  • Gordon JW; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
  • Carvajal L; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
  • Mareyam A; Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
  • Chen HY; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
  • Park I; Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
  • Mammoli D; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
  • Vareth M; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
  • Chang SM; Berkeley Institute for Data Science (BIDS), University of California Berkeley, Berkeley.
  • Wald LL; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Xu D; Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
  • Vigneron DB; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Nelson SJ; Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Li Y; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco.
Magn Reson Med ; 82(2): 833-841, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927300
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the performance of an 8-channel surface coil/clamshell transmitter and 32-channel head array coil/birdcage transmitter for hyperpolarized 13 C brain metabolic imaging.

METHODS:

To determine the field homogeneity of the radiofrequency transmitters, B1 + mapping was performed on an ethylene glycol head phantom and evaluated by means of the double angle method. Using a 3D echo-planar imaging sequence, coil sensitivity and noise-only phantom data were acquired with the 8- and 32-channel receiver arrays, and compared against data from the birdcage in transceiver mode. Multislice frequency-specific 13 C dynamic echo-planar imaging was performed on a patient with a brain tumor for each hardware configuration following injection of hyperpolarized [1-13 C]pyruvate. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was evaluated from pre-whitened phantom and temporally summed patient data after coil combination based on optimal weights.

RESULTS:

The birdcage transmitter produced more uniform B1 + compared with the clamshell 0.07 versus 0.12 (fractional error). Phantom experiments conducted with matched lateral housing separation demonstrated 8- versus 32-channel mean transceiver-normalized SNR performance 0.91 versus 0.97 at the head center; 6.67 versus 2.08 on the sides; 0.66 versus 2.73 at the anterior; and 0.67 versus 3.17 on the posterior aspect. While the 8-channel receiver array showed SNR benefits along lateral aspects, the 32-channel array exhibited greater coverage and a more uniform coil-combined profile. Temporally summed, parameter-normalized patient data showed SNRmean,slice ratios (8-channel/32-channel) ranging 0.5-2.00 from apical to central brain. White matter lactate-to-pyruvate ratios were conserved across hardware 0.45 ± 0.12 (8-channel) versus 0.43 ± 0.14 (32-channel).

CONCLUSION:

The 8- and 32-channel hardware configurations each have advantages in particular brain anatomy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Magn Reson Med Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Magn Reson Med Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article