Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychodynamic case formulations without technical language: a reliability study.
Sørbye, Øystein; Dahl, Hanne-Sofie J; Eells, Tracy D; Amlo, Svein; Hersoug, Anne Grete; Haukvik, Unn K; Hartberg, Cecilie B; Høglend, Per Andreas; Ulberg, Randi.
Afiliación
  • Sørbye Ø; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Dahl HJ; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, PO Box 2168, 3103, Tønsberg, Norway. h.s.j.dahl@psykologi.uio.no.
  • Eells TD; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
  • Amlo S; , Billingstad, Norway.
  • Hersoug AG; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo, PO Box 85, 0319, Vinderen, Norway.
  • Haukvik UK; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo, PO Box 85, 0319, Vinderen, Norway.
  • Hartberg CB; Department of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway.
  • Høglend PA; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo, PO Box 85, 0319, Vinderen, Norway.
  • Ulberg R; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, University of Oslo, PO Box 85, 0319, Vinderen, Norway.
BMC Psychol ; 7(1): 67, 2019 Oct 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31651367
BACKGROUND: To bridge the gap between symptoms and treatment, constructing case formulations is essential for clinicians. Limited scientific value has been attributed to case formulations because of problems with quality, reliability, and validity. For understanding, communication, and treatment planning beyond each specific clinician-patient dyad, a case formulation must convey valid information concerning the patient, as well as being a reliable source of information regardless of the clinician's theoretical orientation. The first aim of the present study is to explore the completeness of unstructured psychodynamic formulations, according to four components outlined in the Case Formulation Content Coding Method (CFCCM). The second aim is to estimate the reliability of independent formulations and their components, using similarity ratings of matched versus mismatched cases. METHODS: This study explores psychodynamic case formulations as made by two or more experienced clinicians after listening to an evaluation interview. The clinicians structured the formulations freely, with the sole constraint that technical, theory-laden terminology should be avoided. The formulations were decomposed into components after all formulations had been written. RESULTS: The results indicated that most formulations were adequately comprehensive, and that overall reliability of the formulations was high (> 0.70) for both experienced and inexperienced clinician raters, although the lower bound reliability estimate of the formulation component deemed most difficult to rate - inferred mechanisms - was marginal, 0.61. CONCLUSIONS: These results were achieved on case formulations made by experienced clinicians using simple experience-near language and minimizing technical concepts, which indicate a communicative quality in the formulations that make them clinically sound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2781-7 ., January 18, 2007.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicoterapia / Entrevista Psicológica / Trastornos Mentales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Psychol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicoterapia / Entrevista Psicológica / Trastornos Mentales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Psychol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega