Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact on sexual function of plasma button transurethral vapour enucleation versus plasmakinetic resection of the large prostate >90 ml: Results of a prospective, randomized trial.
Wang, Zhenqing; Zhang, Jing; Zhang, Hui; Liu, Shuai; Sun, Dingqi; Hu, Liangliang; Fu, Qiang; Zhang, Keqin.
Afiliación
  • Wang Z; Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Zhang J; Department of Nephrology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Zhang H; Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Liu S; Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Sun D; Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Hu L; Department of Urology, Shandong Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital, Zaozhuang, Shandong, China.
  • Fu Q; Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
  • Zhang K; Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Andrologia ; 52(1): e13390, 2020 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31773765
To compare the impact of plasma button transurethral vapour enucleation of the prostate (PVEP) and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) on lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) >90 ml. Between July 2017 and August 2018, 101 patients with symptomatic BPE were randomly, prospectively assigned to either PKRP or PVEP in our department. The clinical characteristics and sexual function were evaluated before and after surgery. Post-void residual volume, IPSS and QoL were all significantly decreased compared with baseline data in each group, while Qmax was significantly increased. The IIEF-5 score showed a slight but nonsignificant increase in both groups at 3 and 6 months after surgery, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. The post-operative rate of reduced ejaculate volume was significantly higher than the pre-operative rate in PKRP group, while there was no significant difference in PVEP group. PVEP had an attenuated effect on no ejaculate compared with PRKP, and they both had a significantly negative effect on no ejaculate. PVEP is an effective and minimally invasive procedure for large prostate. Compared with PKRP, PVEP has no effect on erectile dysfunction and has a lower negative impact on ejaculation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Hiperplasia Prostática / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata / Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior / Disfunción Eréctil Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Andrologia Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Hiperplasia Prostática / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata / Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior / Disfunción Eréctil Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Andrologia Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China