Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effects of Bundled Payment Programs for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty on Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Finch, Daniel J; Pellegrini, Vincent D; Franklin, Patricia D; Magder, Laurence S; Pelt, Christopher E; Martin, Brook I.
Afiliación
  • Finch DJ; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
  • Pellegrini VD; Department of Orthopaedics, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH.
  • Franklin PD; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
  • Magder LS; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Pelt CE; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Martin BI; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(4): 918-925.e7, 2020 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32001083
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient-reported outcomes are essential to demonstrate the value of hip and knee arthroplasty, a common target for payment reforms. We compare patient-reported global and condition-specific outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty based on hospital participation in Medicare's bundled payment programs.

METHODS:

We performed a prospective observational study using the Comparative Effectiveness of Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after Hip and Knee Replacement trial. Differences in patient-reported outcomes through 6 months were compared between bundle and nonbundle hospitals using mixed-effects regression, controlling for baseline patient characteristics. Outcomes were the brief Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score or the brief Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health Score, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, measures of joint function, overall health, and pain, respectively.

RESULTS:

Relative to nonbundled hospitals, arthroplasty patients at bundled hospitals had slightly lower improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (-1.8 point relative difference at 6 months; 95% confidence interval -3.2 to -0.4; P = .011) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (-2.3 point relative difference at 6 months; 95% confidence interval -4.0 to -0.5; P = .010). However, these effects were small, and the proportions of patients who achieved a minimum clinically important difference were similar. Preoperative to postoperative change in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health Score and Numeric Pain Rating Scale demonstrated a similar pattern of slightly worse outcomes at bundled hospitals with similar rates of achieving a minimum clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients receiving care at hospitals participating in Medicare's bundled payment programs do not have meaningfully worse improvements in patient-reported measures of function, health, or pain after hip or knee arthroplasty.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos