Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Analyses Show Similarities in Anterosuperior Acetabular Coverage Between Acetabular Dysplasia and Borderline Dysplasia.

PURPOSE: (1) To compare the acetabular coverage between dysplasia, borderline dysplasia, and control acetabulum in a quantitative 3-dimensional manner; and (2) to evaluate correlations between the radiologic parameters and the 3-dimensional zonal-acetabular coverage. METHODS: We reviewed contralateral hip computed tomography images of patients 16 to 60 years of age who underwent 1 of 3 types of surgeries: eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy, curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy, and total hip replacement with minimum 1-year follow-up from January 2013 to April 2018. A point-cloud model of the acetabulum created from computed tomography was divided into 6 zones. Three-dimensional acetabular coverage was measured radially at intervals of 1°. Mean radial acetabular coverage for each zone was named ZAC (zonal acetabular coverage) and was compared among the 3 subgroups (control: 25° ≤lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] <40°; borderline: 20° ≤LCEA <25°; and dysplasia: LCEA ≤20°) statistically. Further, the correlations between the ZAC in each zone and the LCEA were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: One-hundred fifteen hips were categorized as control (36 hips), borderline (32 hips), and dysplasia (47 hips). The mean anterocranial ZAC in the borderline (87.5 ± 5.7°) was smaller than that in the control (92.6 ± 5.9°, P = .005) but did not differ compared with the dysplasia (84.5 ± 7.6°, P = .131). In contrast, the anterocaudal (71.2 ± 5.0°), posterocranial (85.0 ± 6.4°), and posterocaudal (82.4 ± 4.5°) mean ZACs in the borderline were not different from those in the control (anterocaudal, 74.3 ± 4.6°, P = .090; posterocranial, 87.9 ± 4.3°, P = .082; posterocaudal, 85.1 ± 5.0°, P = .069) respectively. Although there was a very strong positive correlation with supra-anterior ZAC and LCEA (r = 0.750, P < .001), the correlation between the anterocranial ZAC and LCEA was relatively weak (r = 0.574, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The anterosuperior acetabular coverage in the borderline dysplastic acetabulum is more similar to the dysplastic acetabulum than to the normal acetabulum. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study emphasizes the importance of evaluating not only the lateral but also the anterior coverage in borderline dysplasia.