Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women be treated with laser therapy?
Athanasiou, S; Pitsouni, E; Cardozo, L; Zacharakis, D; Petrakis, E; Loutradis, D; Grigoriadis, T.
Afiliación
  • Athanasiou S; Urogynaecology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Alexandra' Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Pitsouni E; Urogynaecology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Alexandra' Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Cardozo L; Urogynecology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
  • Zacharakis D; Urogynaecology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Alexandra' Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Petrakis E; Urogynaecology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Alexandra' Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Loutradis D; 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Alexandra' Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Grigoriadis T; Urogynaecology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Alexandra' Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Climacteric ; 24(1): 101-106, 2021 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32720552
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the non-ablative photothermal erbium laser (ErYAG laser) for managing anterior and/or posterior vaginal compartment prolapse.

METHODS:

A randomized, single-blind, 11 trial was performed comparing ErYAG laser treatment to watchful waiting in postmenopausal women with symptomatic cystocele and/or rectocele stage 2 or 3 who opted to undergo surgery due to bothersome prolapse symptoms. Three ErYAG laser treatments at monthly intervals were applied for the ErYAG laser group, while there was no treatment for the watchful-waiting group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stage 0 or 1 following laser treatment, while secondary outcomes included the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q points), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire short-form, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short-form, and Patients Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and 4 months post baseline.

RESULTS:

Thirty women (15 vs. 15) were eligible to be included. No participants (0%) in either group had POP-Q stage 0 or 1 at 4 months. Moreover, no change was present in the secondary outcomes. In the PGI-I, 2/15 (14%) and 0/15 (0%) participants declared much better/very much better in the laser and watchful-waiting group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings of this study do not support use of the intravaginal ErYAG laser for treatment of the anterior/posterior vaginal wall. Clinical trial identification number NCT03714607.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Posmenopausia / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Climacteric Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Posmenopausia / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Climacteric Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia