Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopies, blood-borne viruses and blood donors: time to move on from precaution.
Hoad, Veronica C; Serhan, George; Seed, Clive R; Kiely, Philip; Gosbell, Iain B.
Afiliación
  • Hoad VC; Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Australia.
  • Serhan G; Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Australia.
  • Seed CR; Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Australia.
  • Kiely P; Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Australia.
  • Gosbell IB; Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Australia.
Vox Sang ; 116(3): 336-341, 2021 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107094
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Based on the Council of Europe directive which dictates regulatory requirements in Australia, blood donors are currently deferred from donating for 4 months after an endoscopic procedure if either polyps were removed or a biopsy sample was taken. We aimed to assess the incidence of blood-borne viruses (BBVs) (HIV, hepatitis B and C) in blood donors who donated after an endoscopic procedure and evaluate the risk to blood safety through risk modelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Donors from 1/1/2013 to 31/12/2017 with an endoscopy deferral on their blood donor file with pre- and post-BBV testing were analysed to determine an incidence of BBVs using standard methods. The standard blood donor cohort was used as a comparator group. Using the incidence of endoscopies and BBV risk, the total residual risk estimate of allowing donors to return postendoscopy without restriction was calculated. RESULTS: The incidence of a BBV postendoscopy in this large cohort of 16,283 where testing has been confirmed postendoscopy was zero (95% CI 0-0·000105). The upper confidence interval of the zero events is 10·5 per 100 000 donations. Total positive donations from 2017 repeat donors were 1·87 per 100 000 (95% CI 0·0000117-0·0000277). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the residual risk remained negligible under realistic worst-case scenarios. CONCLUSION: A BBV endoscopy deferral is not required for blood safety in Australia. The presented data has enabled us to submit a request for an exemption to our regulator, which has been approved and the policy change subsequently implemented by Lifeblood on 4/4/2020.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Donantes de Sangre / Infecciones por VIH / Hepatitis C / Endoscopía / Seguridad de la Sangre / Hepatitis B Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Vox Sang Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Donantes de Sangre / Infecciones por VIH / Hepatitis C / Endoscopía / Seguridad de la Sangre / Hepatitis B Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Vox Sang Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia