Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A simple pacing maneuver to unmask an epicardial connection involving the right-sided pulmonary veins.
Hasebe, Hideyuki; Yoshida, Kentaro; Nogami, Akihiko; Furuyashiki, Yoshitaka; Hanaki, Yuichi; Baba, Masako; Ieda, Masaki.
Afiliación
  • Hasebe H; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Yoshida K; Department of Arrhythmology, Shizuoka Saiseikai General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Nogami A; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Furuyashiki Y; Department of Cardiology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama, Japan.
  • Hanaki Y; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Baba M; Department of Arrhythmology, Shizuoka Saiseikai General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Ieda M; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(2): 287-296, 2021 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33305884
INTRODUCTION: An epicardial connection (EC) between the right-sided pulmonary venous (PV) carina and right atrium (RA) is one of the mechanisms for which carinal ablation is required for right-sided PV isolation. The purpose of the study was to devise a simple pacing maneuver to differentiate an EC from a residual conduction gap on the antral ablation line during radiofrequency catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 133 consecutive patients. After one round of ablation, electrograms at the posterior antrum outside the ablation line were recorded during sinus rhythm (SR) and coronary sinus (CS) pacing, and intervals between the antral and PV potentials were measured in each rhythm. The ΔintervalSR-CS was calculated as the difference between the interval during SR and that during CS pacing. Presence of an EC was confirmed by observation of a RA posterior wall breakthrough during right-sided PV pacing, which was then targeted for ablation. Patients with nonachievement of first-pass isolation (N = 35) and with PV reconnection during the procedure (N = 9) were classified into the EC-group (N = 20) and gap-group (N=24), respectively. The prevalence of carina breakthrough during SR was higher in the EC-group than the gap-group (18 [95%] vs. 1 [4%] patients, p < .0001). The ΔintervalSR-CS was larger in the EC-group versus gap-group (71 [interquartile range, 57-97] vs. 6 [2-9] ms, p < .0001). In all patients with an EC, RA ablation resulted in delay (32 [20-40] ms) (N = 15) or elimination of PV potentials (N = 5). CONCLUSION: An EC can be efficiently discriminated from a conduction gap by a simple pacing maneuver.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Venas Pulmonares / Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Venas Pulmonares / Fibrilación Atrial / Ablación por Catéter Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón