Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expert Consensus of Data Elements for Collection for Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery.
Hirji, Sameer A; Salenger, Rawn; Boyle, Edward M; Williams, Judson; Reddy, V Seenu; Grant, Michael C; Chatterjee, Subhasis; Gregory, Alexander J; Arora, Rakesh; Engelman, Daniel T.
Afiliación
  • Hirji SA; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Salenger R; Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland Saint Joseph Medical Center, Towson, MD, USA.
  • Boyle EM; Department of Cardiac Surgery, St. Charles Medical Center, Bend, OR, USA.
  • Williams J; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, WakeMed Heart Center, WakeMed Clinical Research Institute, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Reddy VS; TriStar Cardiovascular Surgery, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Grant MC; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Chatterjee S; Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Gregory AJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine Program, Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • Arora R; Department of Surgery, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. rakeshcarora@gmail.com.
  • Engelman DT; Heart and Vascular Program, Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, USA.
World J Surg ; 45(4): 917-925, 2021 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33521878
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the emergence of Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) in cardiac surgery, there is no consensus on the essential elements for data reporting for quality improvement efforts, as well as accountability and standardization of outcome reporting across institutions. The aim of this study was to establish a consensus on essential data elements for cardiac ERAS®.

METHODS:

A 2-round modified Delphi technique was utilized based on existing recommendations from the recently published ERAS® cardiac surgery consensus guidelines. Round 1 included a steering committee of 10 experts who oversaw formulation of a focused list of data elements into 3 main areas Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. Round 2 consisted of a multidisciplinary, multinational, heterogenous group of 50 voting experts from across the United States and Europe. All participants evaluated their level of agreement with each data element using a 5-point Likert scale with consensus threshold of 70%.

RESULTS:

In round 1, 17 data elements were considered essential (consensus > = 70%, either positive or negative) and 6 were considered marginal (consensus < = 70%, either positive or negative). In round 2, positive consensus was achieved for 15/17 (88.2%) data elements in the essential category, and all six data elements (100%) in the marginal category, indicating a high level of overall agreement.

CONCLUSION:

This initial study, which identified 21 key data elements for collection in an ERAS® cardiac program, will aid clinicians in establishing a framework for evaluating the quality of their contemporary ERP processes and will allow acquisition of data to help benchmark performance metrics between hospitals.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: World J Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos