Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The strategic biomarker roadmap for the validation of Alzheimer's diagnostic biomarkers: methodological update.
Boccardi, Marina; Dodich, Alessandra; Albanese, Emiliano; Gayet-Ageron, Angèle; Festari, Cristina; Ashton, Nicholas J; Bischof, Gérard N; Chiotis, Konstantinos; Leuzy, Antoine; Wolters, Emma E; Walter, Martin A; Rabinovici, Gil D; Carrillo, Maria; Drzezga, Alexander; Hansson, Oskar; Nordberg, Agneta; Ossenkoppele, Rik; Villemagne, Victor L; Winblad, Bengt; Frisoni, Giovanni B; Garibotto, Valentina.
Afiliación
  • Boccardi M; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases DZNE-Standort Rostock/Greifswald, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany. marina.boccardi@dzne.de.
  • Dodich A; LANVIE - Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. marina.boccardi@dzne.de.
  • Albanese E; Center for Neurocognitive Rehabilitation (CeRiN), CIMeC, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
  • Gayet-Ageron A; NIMTlab - Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Festari C; USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Institute of Public Health (IPH), Lugano, Switzerland.
  • Ashton NJ; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Health and Community Medicine, University of Geneva & University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Bischof GN; LANE - Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
  • Chiotis K; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Leuzy A; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at The University of Gothenburg, Molndal, Sweden.
  • Wolters EE; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK.
  • Walter MA; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Rabinovici GD; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Carrillo M; Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Drzezga A; Theme Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hansson O; Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Nordberg A; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Ossenkoppele R; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Division, Geneva Medical Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Villemagne VL; Departments of Neurology, Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Winblad B; Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Frisoni GB; Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Garibotto V; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn/Cologne, Germany.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 48(7): 2070-2085, 2021 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688996
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The 2017 Alzheimer's disease (AD) Strategic Biomarker Roadmap (SBR) structured the validation of AD diagnostic biomarkers into 5 phases, systematically assessing analytical validity (Phases 1-2), clinical validity (Phases 3-4), and clinical utility (Phase 5) through primary and secondary Aims. This framework allows to map knowledge gaps and research priorities, accelerating the route towards clinical implementation. Within an initiative aimed to assess the development of biomarkers of tau pathology, we revised this methodology consistently with progress in AD research.

METHODS:

We critically appraised the adequacy of the 2017 Biomarker Roadmap within current diagnostic frameworks, discussed updates at a workshop convening the Alzheimer's Association and 8 leading AD biomarker research groups, and detailed the methods to allow consistent assessment of aims achievement for tau and other AD diagnostic biomarkers.

RESULTS:

The 2020 update applies to all AD diagnostic biomarkers. In Phases 2-3, we admitted a greater variety of study designs (e.g., cross-sectional in addition to longitudinal) and reference standards (e.g., biomarker confirmation in addition to clinical progression) based on construct (in addition to criterion) validity. We structured a systematic data extraction to enable transparent and formal evidence assessment procedures. Finally, we have clarified issues that need to be addressed to generate data eligible to evidence-to-decision procedures.

DISCUSSION:

This revision allows for more versatile and precise assessment of existing evidence, keeps up with theoretical developments, and helps clinical researchers in producing evidence suitable for evidence-to-decision procedures. Compliance with this methodology is essential to implement AD biomarkers efficiently in clinical research and diagnostics.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania