Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single response assessment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG1105 (JCOG1105S1).
Nakamura, Nobuhiko; Maruyama, Dai; Machida, Ryunosuke; Ichinohe, Tatsuo; Takayama, Nobuyuki; Ohba, Rie; Ohmachi, Ken; Imaizumi, Yoshitaka; Tokunaga, Masahito; Katsuya, Hiroo; Yoshida, Isao; Sunami, Kazutaka; Kurosawa, Mitsutoshi; Kubota, Nobuko; Morimoto, Hiroaki; Kobayashi, Miki; Kato, Harumi; Kameoka, Yoshihiro; Kagami, Yoshitoyo; Kizaki, Masahiro; Takeuchi, Kazuto; Munakata, Wataru; Iida, Shinsuke; Nagai, Hirokazu.
Afiliación
  • Nakamura N; Department of Hematology and Infectious Disease, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
  • Maruyama D; Department of Hematology Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Machida R; JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ichinohe T; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hiroshima University Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Takayama N; Department of Hematology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ohba R; Department of Clinical Oncology and Hematology, The Jikei University Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ohmachi K; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
  • Imaizumi Y; Department of Hematology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
  • Tokunaga M; Department of Hematology, Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
  • Katsuya H; Division of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
  • Yoshida I; Department of Hematologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
  • Sunami K; Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
  • Kurosawa M; Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Kubota N; Department of Hematology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Morimoto H; Department of Hematology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
  • Kobayashi M; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Kato H; Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Kameoka Y; Department of Hematology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
  • Kagami Y; Department of Hematology, Toyota Kosei Hospital, Toyota, Japan.
  • Kizaki M; Department of Hematology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan.
  • Takeuchi K; First Department of Internal Medicine, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
  • Munakata W; Department of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Iida S; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Nagai H; Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 51(7): 1059-1066, 2021 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33959770
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The International Myeloma Working Group response criteria require two consecutive assessments of paraprotein levels. We conducted an exploratory analysis to evaluate whether a single response assessment could be a substitute for the International Myeloma Working Group criteria using data from JCOG1105, a randomized phase II study on melphalan, prednisolone and bortezomib.

METHODS:

Of 91 patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, 79 patients were included. We calculated the kappa coefficient to evaluate the degree of agreement between the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the single response assessment.

RESULTS:

Based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, 11 (13.9%), 20 (25.3%), 36 (45.6%) and 12 (15.2%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. Based on the single response assessment, 17 (21.5%), 19 (24.1%), 35 (44.3%) and 8 (10.1%) patients had stringent complete response/complete response, very good partial response, partial response and stable disease, respectively. The kappa coefficient was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88), demonstrating good agreement. The single response assessment was not inferior to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria in the median progression-free survival (3.8 and 2.9 years) in stringent complete response/complete response patients, suggesting that the single response assessment was not an overestimation.

CONCLUSIONS:

The single response assessment could be a substitute for the current International Myeloma Working Group criteria for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prednisolona / Bortezomib / Melfalán / Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Clin Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prednisolona / Bortezomib / Melfalán / Mieloma Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Jpn J Clin Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón