Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage: an economic evaluation based on the MifeMiso trial.
Okeke Ogwulu, C B; Williams, E V; Chu, J J; Devall, A J; Beeson, L E; Hardy, P; Cheed, V; Yongzhong, S; Jones, L L; La Fontaine Papadopoulos, J H; Bender-Atik, R; Brewin, J; Hinshaw, K; Choudhary, M; Ahmed, A; Naftalin, J; Nunes, N; Oliver, A; Izzat, F; Bhatia, K; Hassan, I; Jeve, Y; Hamilton, J; Debs, S; Bottomley, C; Ross, J; Watkins, L; Underwood, M; Cheong, Y; Kumar, C S; Gupta, P; Small, R; Pringle, S; Hodge, F S; Shahid, A; Horne, A W; Quenby, S; Gallos, I D; Coomarasamy, A; Roberts, T E.
Afiliación
  • Okeke Ogwulu CB; Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Williams EV; Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Chu JJ; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Devall AJ; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Beeson LE; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hardy P; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Cheed V; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Yongzhong S; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Jones LL; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • La Fontaine Papadopoulos JH; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Bender-Atik R; The Miscarriage Association, Wakefield, UK.
  • Brewin J; Tommy's Charity, London, UK.
  • Hinshaw K; Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside & Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
  • Choudhary M; Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Ahmed A; Sunderland Royal Hospital, South Tyneside & Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
  • Naftalin J; University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Nunes N; West Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Isleworth, UK.
  • Oliver A; St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Izzat F; University Hospital Coventry, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
  • Bhatia K; Burnley General Hospital, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley, UK.
  • Hassan I; Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Jeve Y; Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hamilton J; Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Debs S; Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
  • Bottomley C; University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Ross J; Kings College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Watkins L; Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Underwood M; Princess Royal Hospital, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Telford, UK.
  • Cheong Y; Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Kumar CS; NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
  • Gupta P; Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Small R; University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Pringle S; NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
  • Hodge FS; Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK.
  • Shahid A; Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
  • Horne AW; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Quenby S; The Biomedical Research Unit in Reproductive Health, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
  • Gallos ID; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Coomarasamy A; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Roberts TE; Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BJOG ; 128(9): 1534-1545, 2021 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33969614
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of mifepristone and misoprostol (MifeMiso) compared with misoprostol only for the medical management of a missed miscarriage. DESIGN: Within-trial economic evaluation and model-based analysis to set the findings in the context of the wider economic evidence for a range of comparators. Incremental costs and outcomes were calculated using nonparametric bootstrapping and reported using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Analyses were performed from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS). SETTING: Twenty-eight UK NHS early pregnancy units. SAMPLE: A cohort of 711 women aged 16-39 years with ultrasound evidence of a missed miscarriage. METHODS: Treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol or with matched placebo and misoprostol tablets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per additional successfully managed miscarriage and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: For the within-trial analysis, MifeMiso intervention resulted in an absolute effect difference of 6.6% (95% CI 0.7-12.5%) per successfully managed miscarriage and a QALYs difference of 0.04% (95% CI -0.01 to 0.1%). The average cost per successfully managed miscarriage was lower in the MifeMiso arm than in the placebo and misoprostol arm, with a cost saving of £182 (95% CI £26-£338). Hence, the MifeMiso intervention dominated the use of misoprostol alone. The model-based analysis showed that the MifeMiso intervention is preferable, compared with expectant management, and this is the current medical management strategy. However, the model-based evidence suggests that the intervention is a less effective but less costly strategy than surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: The within-trial analysis found that based on cost-effectiveness grounds, the MifeMiso intervention is likely to be recommended by decision makers for the medical management of women presenting with a missed miscarriage. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is more effective and less costly than misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriages.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Abortivos / Mifepristona / Misoprostol / Aborto Retenido Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BJOG Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Abortivos / Mifepristona / Misoprostol / Aborto Retenido Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BJOG Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article