Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Persistence of asthma biologic use in a US claims database.
Maddux, Jacob T; Inselman, Jonathan W; Jeffery, Molly M; Lam, Regina W; Shah, Nilay D; Rank, Matthew A.
Afiliación
  • Maddux JT; Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona; Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona. Electronic address: Maddux.jacob@mayo.edu.
  • Inselman JW; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Jeffery MM; Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Lam RW; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona.
  • Shah ND; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Rank MA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; Division of Pulmonology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 127(6): 648-654, 2021 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33971361
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little is known on the persistence of asthma biologic use in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the persistence of asthma biologic use and time to clinical response in clinical practice.

METHODS:

A cohort of people with asthma who used at least 1 asthma biologic was constructed using data from 2003 to 2019 in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Treatment persistence was defined by the length of time that a person continuously used an asthma biologic, allowing for a lapse in use up to 4 months before confirming that a person stopped. Clinical response to treatment (defined as a decline in asthma exacerbations of at least 50% compared with the 6 months before starting an asthma biologic) was described over time and in relation to biologic persistence.

RESULTS:

There were 9575 people who had at least 1 episode of asthma biologic use. There were 5319 people (64%, 95% confidence interval, 63%-65%) who completed 6 months or more on an asthma biologic and 3284 (45%, 95% confidence interval, 44%-46%) who completed 12 months or more. Of people with 1 or more asthma exacerbation 6 months before index biologic use, 63%, 76%, 80%, and 81% realized a 50% or more reduction in postindex asthma exacerbations in the first 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 18 months, and 18 to 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Between 48% and 64% of people remained on an asthma biologic for 6 months or more after first use. Most people who achieved a reduction in asthma exacerbations did so in the first 6 months of treatment.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Productos Biológicos / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Productos Biológicos / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article