Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Evaluating Rheumatoid Arthritis: Preliminary Research Based on an Animal Model.
Gong, Yiran; Huang, Yinan; Su, Yiming; He, Juxin; Chen, Shuqiang.
Afiliación
  • Gong Y; Department of Ultrasonic Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China (mainland).
  • Huang Y; Department of Ultrasonic Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China (mainland).
  • Su Y; Department of Ultrasonic Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China (mainland).
  • He J; Department of Ultrasonic Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China (mainland).
  • Chen S; Department of Ultrasonic Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit ; 27: e931327, 2021 Jun 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172694
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of grayscale ultrasound (GSUS), power Doppler imaging (PDI), and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis through animal experiments. MATERIAL AND METHODS A rabbit RA model was constructed. The animals were randomly divided into 2 groups, namely, the RA model group and the control group. GSUS, PDI, and CEUS were performed in the model group during early RA and were compared with pathology of synovial biopsies. The consistency of 3 types of ultrasonography was evaluated in tandem with pathological grading. RESULTS 23 rabbits in the RA model group completed the experiment. GSUS showed that the synovial thickening of grades 1, 2 and 3 occurred in 12, 19, and 15 joints, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PDI in the diagnosis of knee joint synovitis in RA grades 1, 2, and 3 were 80.56% (29/36), 60.00% (6/10), and 76.09% (35/46), respectively, while those with CEUS were 94.44% (34/36), 90.00% (9/10), and 93.47% (43/46), respectively. The differences in diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 2 methods were statistically significant. Additionally, the thickness of the synovium measured with GSUS precontrast was greater than that of postcontrast. CONCLUSIONS RA evaluated with GSUS is often more hypertrophied than when evaluated with CEUS, while evaluation by PDI is less hypertrophied than that by CEUS. However, from a practical view point, GSUS and PDI are of sufficient practical value, except for in a few special cases.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Aumento de la Imagen / Ultrasonografía / Medios de Contraste Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Monit Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Aumento de la Imagen / Ultrasonografía / Medios de Contraste Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Med Sci Monit Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article