Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ethical and moral perspectives of individuals who considered/used preimplantation (embryo) genetic testing.
Zhang, Jiahui; Pastore, Lisa M; Sarwana, Miriam; Klein, Samantha; Lobel, Marci; Rubin, Lisa R.
Afiliación
  • Zhang J; Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony, Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Pastore LM; Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Sarwana M; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Klein S; Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lobel M; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
  • Rubin LR; Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA.
J Genet Couns ; 31(1): 176-187, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34279057
ABSTRACT
This study examined perspectives on the ethical implications of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) among individuals who actually (not hypothetically) used or considered using PGT. Most of the prior patient-centered research on PGT ethics used qualitative designs (9 out of the 11 articles) and focused only on single gene testing. This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online questionnaire; 15 items assessed potential ethical concerns involved in PGT decision-making, including clinical indications for PGT, the greater implications of PGT for society, and unused embryo disposition. N = 207 individuals (mean female/male age 35.7/38.9 years, 21% Hispanic or non-White) who had recently used or considered using PGT for single gene (60%) or for chromosomal testing (40%) completed the questionnaire. Most respondents supported PGT screening for disease conditions with childhood or adult onset that are untreatable (64%-85% across items); most opposed PGT for trait selection (76%-81%). Most respondents agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making (66%-67%), although some expressed concern over potential unforeseen consequences (25%-30%). Regarding disposition of embryos without known genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored freezing indefinitely (86%) or donating to another family (69%), while for embryos with genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored donating to research (78%) or destroying them (62%). Stratification by religious affiliation revealed several differences, such as less acceptance of PGT for diseases that occur in adulthood and have no treatment options among Protestants (p = .015) and greater willingness to donate surplus embryos to research among participants without a religious affiliation (p < .001). These results are limited by the relatively homogeneous sample of participants (mostly White, married, and predominantly college-educated). In summary, participants who considered/used PGT found PGT acceptable overall for screening for disease conditions; most opposed using PGT for trait selection. Our novel questionnaire provides a structured tool for assessing the ethical perspectives surrounding the use of PGT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Preimplantación / Aneuploidia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Genet Couns Asunto de la revista: GENETICA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Preimplantación / Aneuploidia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Genet Couns Asunto de la revista: GENETICA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos