Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels.
Maani, Nika; Panabaker, Karen; McCuaig, Jeanna M; Buckley, Kathleen; Semotiuk, Kara; Farncombe, Kirsten M; Ainsworth, Peter; Panchal, Seema; Sadikovic, Bekim; Armel, Susan Randall; Lin, Hanxin; Kim, Raymond H.
Afiliación
  • Maani N; Program for Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Panabaker K; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • McCuaig JM; Medical Genetics Program of Southwestern Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
  • Buckley K; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Semotiuk K; Familial Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Farncombe KM; Grand River Hospital, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
  • Ainsworth P; Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Panchal S; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Sadikovic B; Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Division of Molecular Diagnostics, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
  • Armel SR; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Lin H; Familial Breast Cancer Clinic, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Kim RH; Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Division of Molecular Diagnostics, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
NPJ Genom Med ; 6(1): 63, 2021 Jul 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34282142
ABSTRACT
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have facilitated multi-gene panel (MGP) testing to detect germline DNA variants in hereditary cancer patients. This sensitive technique can uncover unexpected, non-germline incidental findings indicative of mosaicism, clonal hematopoiesis (CH), or hematologic malignancies. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify cases of incidental findings from NGS-MGP testing. Inclusion criteria included 1) multiple pathogenic variants in the same patient; 2) pathogenic variants at a low allele fraction; and/or 3) the presence of pathogenic variants not consistent with family history. Secondary tissue analysis, complete blood count (CBC) and medical record review were conducted to further delineate the etiology of the pathogenic variants. Of 6060 NGS-MGP tests, 24 cases fulfilling our inclusion criteria were identified. Pathogenic variants were detected in TP53, ATM, CHEK2, BRCA1 and APC. 18/24 (75.0%) patients were classified as CH, 3/24 (12.5%) as mosaic, 2/24 (8.3%) related to a hematologic malignancy, and 1/24 (4.2%) as true germline. We describe a case-specific workflow to identify and interpret the nature of incidental findings on NGS-MGP. This workflow will provide oncology and genetic clinics a practical guide for the management and counselling of patients with unexpected NGS-MGP findings.

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Genom Med Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Genom Med Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá