Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of Spinal Cord Stimulators in Patients With Pacemakers or Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators: A Review of Documented Accounts of Interference.
Martens, Joshua Manuel; Fiala, Kenneth; Glover, Christopher; Zacharias, Nicholas; Abd-Elsayed, Alaa.
Afiliación
  • Martens JM; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Fiala K; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Glover C; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Zacharias N; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Abd-Elsayed A; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: abdelsayed@wisc.edu.
Neuromodulation ; 26(1): 43-56, 2023 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34327771
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the currently available evidence regarding associations between spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lead type, clinical indications for device placement, and interference between SCSs and cardiac pacemakers (CPMs)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). STUDY

DESIGN:

Review of case reports and original research studies assessing the interference between SCS and CPM/ICD. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for articles commenting on the interference between SCS and CPM/ICD. The search criteria which generated the greatest number of relevant studies was (spinal cord stimulator AND [pacemaker OR implantable cardioverter defibrillator]). Additional, empiric review was conducted using JSTOR, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost databases; however, no additional eligible studies were identified. Data were extracted, summarized into tables, and quantitatively analyzed using LibreTexts and MedCalc software.

RESULTS:

There was no statistically significant interference observed between SCS and CPM/ICD devices in patients regardless of indication for SCS placement and SCS lead polarity.

LIMITATIONS:

Limited by variability of patient cases and variability in maximum frequency and amplitude of SCS devices tried in individual cases. Also limited by small sample size and the absence of a standard definition for device interference across studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Interference between cardiac devices and SCSs is a rare occurrence. As there are currently no published guidelines, devices should be interrogated on a case-by-case basis in the SCS trial period (if implanted after cardiac device), during permanent implantation, and during scheduled follow-up visits. Peri-operative testing should include increasing the SCS settings to maximally tolerated levels with cardiac device set at its maximum sensitivity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Desfibriladores Implantables Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica / Desfibriladores Implantables Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuromodulation Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos