Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms™ in COPD as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials: A Rapid Systematic Review.
Bushnell, Donald M; Wilson, Rozanne; Gutzwiller, Florian S; Leidy, Nancy K; Hache, Carolina; Thach, Chau; Vogelmeier, Claus F.
Afiliación
  • Bushnell DM; Evidera, Seattle, Washington, United States.
  • Wilson R; Evidera, Seattle, Washington, United States.
  • Gutzwiller FS; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Leidy NK; Evidera, Seattle, Washington, United States.
  • Hache C; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Thach C; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Vogelmeier CF; Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany and Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis ; 8(4): 551-571, 2021 Oct 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34614551
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) struggle with respiratory symptoms that impair their daily activities and quality of life. Understanding a treatment's ability to relieve symptoms requires precise assessment. The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RSTMCOPD) was developed to quantify respiratory symptoms in clinical trials. This study aimed to better understand how trials use this patient-reported outcome measure as an endpoint, as well as its responsiveness and performance relative to other outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES:

To summarize the use of the E-RSCOPD in pharmacological trials since its qualification by regulatory authorities.

METHODS:

A rapid systematic literature review, using key biomedical databases to identify English language full-text publications of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that included the E-RSCOPD as an endpoint (2010-2020). Two investigators independently screened the publications and extracted data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Of 219 screened records, 28 full-text publications were included, and data from 17 reporting 20 unique double-blind RCTs were synthesized. The E-RSCOPD was positioned as a primary or secondary endpoint in six publications (35%), and served as an exploratory or additional endpoint in 11 (65%). Statistically significant E-RSCOPD treatment effects versus placebo/comparator were found in 13 of the 14 publications reporting symptom results. E-RSCOPD effects corresponded well with other outcome measures (e.g., St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and forced expiratory volume 1 second [FEV1]). Two publications reported the number of responders.

CONCLUSIONS:

E-RSCOPD is sensitive to treatment effects in clinical trials testing drug therapies. Presentation of trial results should include responder analyses to facilitate interpretation and application of results.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos