Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
RespiraTox - Development of a QSAR model to predict human respiratory irritants.
Wehr, Matthias M; Sarang, Satinder S; Rooseboom, Martijn; Boogaard, Peter J; Karwath, Andreas; Escher, Sylvia E.
Afiliación
  • Wehr MM; Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine - ITEM, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: matthias.wehr@item.fraunhofer.de.
  • Sarang SS; Shell International, Shell Health, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: Satinder.Sarang@Shell.Com.
  • Rooseboom M; Shell International, Shell Health, The Hague, Netherlands. Electronic address: Martijn.Rooseboom@shell.com.
  • Boogaard PJ; Shell International, Shell Health, The Hague, Netherlands; Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  • Karwath A; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: A.Karwath@bham.ac.uk.
  • Escher SE; Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine - ITEM, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: sylvia.escher@item.fraunhofer.de.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 128: 105089, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34861320
Respiratory irritation is an important human health endpoint in chemical risk assessment. There are two established modes of action of respiratory irritation, 1) sensory irritation mediated by the interaction with sensory neurons, potentially stimulating trigeminal nerve, and 2) direct tissue irritation. The aim of our research was to, develop a QSAR method to predict human respiratory irritants, and to potentially reduce the reliance on animal testing for the identification of respiratory irritants. Compounds are classified as irritating based on combined evidence from different types of toxicological data, including inhalation studies with acute and repeated exposure. The curated project database comprised 1997 organic substances, 1553 being classified as irritating and 444 as non-irritating. A comparison of machine learning approaches, including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forests (RFs), and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBTs), showed, the best classification was obtained by GBTs. The LR model resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.65, while the optimal performance for both RFs and GBTs gives an AUC of 0.71. In addition to the classification and the information on the applicability domain, the web-based tool provides a list of structurally similar analogues together with their experimental data to facilitate expert review for read-across purposes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistema Respiratorio / Relación Estructura-Actividad Cuantitativa / Aprendizaje Automático / Irritantes Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistema Respiratorio / Relación Estructura-Actividad Cuantitativa / Aprendizaje Automático / Irritantes Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article