Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physical work exposure matrix for use in the UK Biobank.
Yanik, E L; Stevens, M J; Harris, E Clare; Walker-Bone, K E; Dale, A M; Ma, Y; Colditz, G A; Evanoff, B A.
Afiliación
  • Yanik EL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Stevens MJ; Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Harris EC; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Walker-Bone KE; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Dale AM; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Ma Y; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Colditz GA; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Evanoff BA; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 72(2): 132-141, 2022 02 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34927206
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

UK Biobank (UKB) is a large prospective cohort capturing numerous health outcomes, but limited occupational information (job title, self-reported manual work and occupational walking/standing).

AIMS:

To create and evaluate validity of a linkage between UKB and a job exposure matrix for physical work exposures based on the US Occupational Information Network (O*NET) database.

METHODS:

Job titles and UK Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes were collected during UKB baseline assessment visits. Using existing crosswalks, UK SOC codes were mapped to US SOC codes allowing linkage to O*NET variables capturing numerous dimensions of physical work. Job titles with the highest O*NET scores were assessed to evaluate face validity. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to compare O*NET scores to self-reported UKB measures.

RESULTS:

Among 324 114 participants reporting job titles, 323 936 were linked to O*NET. Expected relationships between scores and self-reported measures were observed. For static strength (0-7 scale), the median O*NET score was 1.0 (e.g. audiologists), with a highest score of 4.88 for stone masons and a positive correlation with self-reported heavy manual work (Spearman's coefficient = 0.50). For time spent standing (1-5 scale), the median O*NET score was 2.72 with a highest score of 5 for cooks and a positive correlation with self-reported occupational walking/standing (Spearman's coefficient = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS:

While most jobs were not physically demanding, a wide range of physical work values were assigned to a diverse set of jobs. This novel linkage of a job exposure matrix to UKB provides a potentially valuable tool for understanding relationships between occupational exposures and disease.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Exposición Profesional / Bancos de Muestras Biológicas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Occup Med (Lond) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Exposición Profesional / Bancos de Muestras Biológicas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Occup Med (Lond) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos