Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multidomain decision support tool to prevent falls in older people: the FinCH cluster RCT.
Logan, Philippa A; Horne, Jane C; Allen, Frances; Armstrong, Sarah J; Clark, Allan B; Conroy, Simon; Darby, Janet; Fox, Chris; Gladman, John Rf; Godfrey, Maureen; Gordon, Adam L; Irvine, Lisa; Leighton, Paul; McCartney, Karen; Mountain, Gail; Robertson, Kate; Robinson, Katie; Sach, Tracey H; Stirling, Susan; Wilson, Edward Cf; Sims, Erika J.
Afiliación
  • Logan PA; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Horne JC; Community Rehabilitation Team, Nottingham CityCare Partnership, Nottingham, UK.
  • Allen F; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
  • Armstrong SJ; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
  • Clark AB; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Conroy S; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Darby J; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Fox C; Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Gladman JR; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Godfrey M; Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Gordon AL; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Irvine L; Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Leighton P; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • McCartney K; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
  • Mountain G; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
  • Robertson K; Health Care of the Elderly Directorate, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK.
  • Robinson K; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Sach TH; School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Stirling S; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
  • Wilson EC; National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
  • Sims EJ; Medical School, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
Health Technol Assess ; 26(9): 1-136, 2022 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35125131
Falls in care home residents are common, unpleasant, costly and hard to prevent. We tested whether or not the Guide to Action for falls prevention in Care Homes (GtACH) programme was effective in preventing falls. In this programme, care home staff were systematically trained and supported in the assessment of residents' risk of falling and the generation of a falls reduction care plan. We undertook a randomised controlled trial comparing the GtACH programme with usual care, which does not involve this systematic attention to falls prevention. We also undertook a process evaluation, observing organisational and care processes, and an economic study to evaluate value for money. A total of 39 care homes were randomly allocated to the GtACH programme and 45 care homes were randomly allocated to usual care, involving a total of 1657 residents. The main comparison between the two arms was the rate of falls during months 4­6 after randomisation, when we expected any effect to be at its peak. We also assessed the falls rates before and 6 months after this period. We measured activity and dependency levels, as it was important to be sure that any reduction in the rate of falls was not achieved through restrictive care practices. We saw a 43% reduction in the falls rates of the GtACH programme participants during months 4­6, without observing any reduction in residents' activity or dependency. Care home staff and relatives were positive about the GtACH programme. The GtACH programme was good value for money, as it was likely to be cost-effective. The effect of the programme waned over months 6­12, which may be because some staff did not embed the GtACH programme in their usual practice routines, and awareness levels may have dropped.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Pinzones Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Health Technol Assess Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / TECNOLOGIA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Pinzones Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Health Technol Assess Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / TECNOLOGIA MEDICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido