Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Study Examining the Usefulness of a New Measure of Research Engagement.
Bowen, Deborah J; Ackermann, Nicole; Thompson, Vetta Saunders; Nederveld, Andrea; Goodman, Melody.
Afiliación
  • Bowen DJ; Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. dbowen@uw.edu.
  • Ackermann N; Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Thompson VS; Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Nederveld A; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Goodman M; Department of Biostatistics, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(Suppl 1): 50-56, 2022 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35349011
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Engagement of relevant stakeholders' ideas, opinions, and concerns is critical to the success of modern research projects. We have developed a tool to measure stakeholder engagement, called the Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST). The purpose of this paper is to present the implementation and uptake of the stakeholder engagement measure REST among research teams, including the assessment of barriers and facilitating factors for use of the new research engagement measure in practice.

METHODS:

In this implementation study, project team members participated in baseline and follow-up web-based surveys. Web-based interviews were conducted with a subset of project teams that implemented the REST. On the baseline survey, project teams were asked to provide details about up to three ongoing or recently completed projects, were asked if they agreed with compensation for REST completion, and were asked if they would like to send the survey to stakeholders or would prefer our project team to email their project stakeholders. Follow-up surveys contained questions on reactions to implementing REST and results of REST.

RESULTS:

Project team members/researchers who completed the baseline survey (n=86) were mostly female (79%) and Non-Hispanic/Latino(a) White (76%). Those who implemented REST were also mostly female (86%) and Non-Hispanic/Latino(a) White (71%), with an average of 11 years in academic research. About 98% of all participants completing the baseline survey had the capacity to survey partners, while 100% of all teams who implemented REST did. A small portion of respondents indicated the time commitment of REST would be a barrier (29% of baseline survey respondents, 10% of those who implemented REST) and indicated workload would be a barrier (31% of baseline survey respondents, 14% of those who implemented REST).

DISCUSSION:

The data presented here indicate that REST implementation is feasible in a volunteer group of ongoing research projects.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigadores / Participación de los Interesados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Investigadores / Participación de los Interesados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos