Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Blastocyst versus cleavage embryo transfer improves cumulative live birth rates, time and cost in oocyte recipients: a randomized controlled trial.
Clua, Elisabet; Rodríguez, Ignacio; Arroyo, Gemma; Racca, Annalisa; Martínez, Francisca; Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
Afiliación
  • Clua E; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: eliclu@dexeus.com.
  • Rodríguez I; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Arroyo G; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Racca A; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Martínez F; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Polyzos NP; Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Gran Via de Carles III, 71 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 44(6): 995-1004, 2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35430119
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION Does embryo transfer day (day 5 versus day 3) affect cumulative live birth rates (CLBR), time to live birth (TLB) and cost per live birth (CPL) in recipients of donated oocytes? STUDY

DESIGN:

A single-centre RCT conducted between April 2017 and August 2018. Recipients of donated oocytes were randomized to cleavage-stage (day 3) or to blastocyst-stage (day 5) embryo transfer. Eligible recipients were aged 18-50 years and in their first or second synchronous cycle. Primary outcome was CLBR (12 months from first embryo transfer), and fresh and subsequent cryopreserved transfers were considered; TLB and CPL were also analysed.

RESULTS:

Recipients (n = 134) were randomized to the day-3 group (n = 69) or to the day-5 group (n = 65). Day-5 transfer resulted in a 15.9% relative increase in CLBR and a significant shorter TLB compared with day-3 transfer. To reach a 50% CLBR, the day-3 group required 6 months more than the day-5 group (15.3 versus 8.9 months, respectively). The average CPL in the day-3 strategy cost 24% more than the day-5 strategy (€14817.10 versus €10959.20). Clinical pregnancy rate was 25% less in the day-3 group. The trial was prematurely stopped after poor initial results in the day-3 arm led to unplanned interim analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

The transfer of blastocyst-stage embryos in recipients of donated oocytes is preferred as it leads to a higher clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, shorter time to pregnancy and lower costs to achieve live birth, compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fertilización In Vitro / Tasa de Natalidad Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fertilización In Vitro / Tasa de Natalidad Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article