Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Network meta-analysis of the optimal time of applying enteral immunonutrition in esophageal cancer patients receiving esophagectomy.
Tian, Xu; Jin, Yan-Fei; Liu, Xiao-Ling; Chen, Hui; Chen, Wei-Qing; Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F.
Afiliación
  • Tian X; Nursing Department, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Avinguda Catalunya, 35 43002, Tarragona, Spain.
  • Jin YF; Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Hunan, China.
  • Liu XL; Department of Ultrasound, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Chen H; Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Chen WQ; Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Jiménez-Herrera MF; Nursing Department, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Avinguda Catalunya, 35 43002, Tarragona, Spain. maria.jimenez@urv.cat.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(9): 7133-7146, 2022 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35445866
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Enteral immunonutrition (EIN) has been extensively applied in cancer patients; however, its role in esophageal cancer (EC) patients receiving esophagectomy remains unclear. We performed this network meta-analysis to investigate the impact of EIN on patients undergoing surgery for EC and further determine the optimal time of applying EIN.

METHODS:

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and China National Knowledgement Infrastructure (CNKI) to identify eligible studies. Categorical data was expressed as the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI), and continuous data was expressed as mean difference (MD) with 95% CI. Meta-analysis with head-to-head approach and network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of EIN on clinical outcomes using RevMan 5.3 and ADDIS V.1.16.8 software. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank all nutritional regimes.

RESULTS:

Total 14 studies involving 1071 patients were included. Meta-analysis with head-to-head approach indicated no difference between EIN regardless of the application time and standard EN (SEN); however, subgroup analyses found that postoperative EIN was associated with decreased incidence of total infectious complications (OR = 0.47; 95%CI = 0.26 to 0.84; p = 0.01) and pneumonia (OR = 0.47; 95%CI = 0.25 to 0.90; p = 0.02) and shortened the length of hospitalization (LOH) (MD = - 1.01; 95%CI = - 1.44 to - 0.57; p < 0.001) compared to SEN, which were all supported by network meta-analyses. Ranking probability analysis further indicated that postoperative EIN has the highest probability of being the optimal option in terms of these three outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Postoperative EIN should be preferentially utilized in EC patients undergoing esophagectomy because it has optimal potential of decreasing the risk of total infectious complications and pneumonia and shortening LOH. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER 10.17605/OSF.IO/KJ9UY.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Nutrición Enteral Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Nutrición Enteral Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España