Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Sui, Yue; Chen, Xing; Ma, Ting; Lu, Junhui; Xiao, Tao; Wang, Zhenzhen; Wen, Qing; Wang, Guanfeng; Jia, Hui; Cao, Fengzhen; Wu, Xiaopeng; Zhang, Yiping; Hao, Junlian; Wang, Naping.
Afiliación
  • Sui Y; Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • Chen X; Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • Ma T; The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • Lu J; Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • Xiao T; Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • Wang Z; Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
  • Wen Q; The Second People's Hospital of Datong, Datong, China.
  • Wang G; The Second People's Hospital of Datong, Datong, China.
  • Jia H; The Second People's Hospital of Datong, Datong, China.
  • Cao F; Erdos Kangning Physical Examination Center, Erdos, China.
  • Wu X; Erdos Kangning Physical Examination Center, Erdos, China.
  • Zhang Y; Lvliang Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Lvliang, China.
  • Hao J; Datong Shoujia Digestive Disease Hospital, Datong, China.
  • Wang N; Xiaoyi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Xiaoyi, China.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 37(8): 1603-1609, 2022 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35618650
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE). METHODS: Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same-day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation-related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation-related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same-day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Anestesia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Anestesia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China