Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are Formal Voiding Trials Necessary After Posterior Compartment Reconstructive Surgery?
Askew, Amy L; Margulies, Samantha L; Sakai, Nozomi; Schroeder, Michelle N; Chu, Christine M; Wu, Jennifer M; Willis-Gray, Marcella.
Afiliación
  • Askew AL; From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Margulies SL; From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Sakai N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Schroeder MN; From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Chu CM; From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Wu JM; From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Willis-Gray M; From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 28(9): 596-601, 2022 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35703272
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE Posterior compartment surgery is considered a risk factor for postoperative urinary retention because of the impact of postoperative pain on the pelvic floor; however, few studies have examined the association between posterior compartment reconstructive surgery and urinary retention.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to compare rates of urinary retention in patients undergoing vaginal reconstructive surgery, without hysterectomy, in the posterior compartment only versus any apical and/or anterior compartment (with or without posterior compartment). STUDY

DESIGN:

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients who underwent surgery, without hysterectomy, in the posterior compartment only versus any apical and/or anterior compartment (with or without posterior compartment) from January 2015 to November 2020. Our primary outcome was rate of postoperative urinary retention, defined as a failed voiding trial before discharge. Secondary outcome was days of catheterization. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess variables associated with a failed voiding trial.

RESULTS:

Of 362 patients, 141 (39.0%) underwent surgery in the posterior compartment only and 221 (61.0%) underwent vaginal apical and/or anterior compartment surgical procedures. Rate of retention was significantly lower in the posterior compartment only group (9.9% vs 41.6%, P < 0.001). The median numbers of days of catheterization were significantly fewer in the posterior compartment only group (0 [0,0] vs 0 [0,3], P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, posterior compartment only surgery was associated with passing the voiding trial (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.97-12.03).

CONCLUSIONS:

Rates of postoperative urinary retention after surgery in the posterior compartment are low, and these patients may not require formal voiding trials after surgery.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Retención Urinaria / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urogynecology (Phila) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Retención Urinaria / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urogynecology (Phila) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article