Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of customized vibratory device on orthodontic tooth movement: A prospective randomized control trial.
Khera, Amit K; Raghav, Pradeep; Mehra, Varun; Wadhawan, Ashutosh; Gupta, Navna; Phull, Tarun S.
Afiliación
  • Khera AK; Department of Orthodontics, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, India.
  • Raghav P; Department of Orthodontics, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, India.
  • Mehra V; Department of Orthodontics, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, India.
  • Wadhawan A; Department of Orthodontics, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, India.
  • Gupta N; Department of Orthodontics, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, India.
  • Phull TS; Private Practitioner, Meerut, India.
J Orthod Sci ; 11: 18, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35754416
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The primary purpose of the present trial was to evaluate the effect of low-frequency (30Hz) vibrations on the rate of canine retraction. SETTING AND

DESIGN:

Single-center, split mouth prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS AND

MATERIAL:

100 screened subjects (aged18-25 years) were selected; out of which 30 subjects having Class I bimaxillary protrusion or Class II div 1 malocclusion, requiring upper 1st premolar therapeutic extractions, were selected for the study. A split-mouth study design was prepared for the maxillary arch of each selected individual and was randomly allocated into vibration and nonvibration side (control) groups. A customized vibratory device was fabricated for each subject to deliver low-frequency vibrations (30 Hz). Scanned 3D models were prepared sequentially to assess the amount of tooth movement from baseline (T0),(T1), (T2), (T3), and (T4)-4th month of canine retraction. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED Independent "t" test.

RESULTS:

There was no statistically significant differencein the rate of individual canine retraction among the experimental and control groups when the intergroup comparison was done using independent "t" test at T1-T0, (P = 0.954), T2-T1 (P = 0.244), T3-T2 (P = 0.357), and T4-T3 (P = 0.189).

CONCLUSION:

The low-frequency vibratory stimulation of 30 Hz using a customized vibratory device did not significantly accelerate the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ctri.nic.in (CTRI/2019/05/019043).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Orthod Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Orthod Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India