Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass in the management of obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2): a retrospective cohort study.
Fadel, Michael G; Fehervari, Matyas; Lairy, Ali; Das, Bibek; Alyaqout, Khaled; Ashrafian, Hutan; Khwaja, Haris; Efthimiou, Evangelos.
Afiliación
  • Fadel MG; Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK. m.fadel@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Fehervari M; Imperial College London, London, UK. m.fadel@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Lairy A; Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
  • Das B; Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Alyaqout K; Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
  • Ashrafian H; Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait.
  • Khwaja H; Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Efthimiou E; Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 407(8): 3349-3356, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36050499
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity, BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2, can be a challenging operation. Weight loss with intra-gastric balloon (IGB) insertion prior to LRYGB may improve operative outcomes.

METHODS:

Between June 2000 and June 2020, patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 underwent either IGB insertion followed by LRYGB (two-stage group), or LRYGB as the definitive bariatric procedure (single-stage group) in our institution. The two-stage procedure was adopted for high risk individuals. Primary outcome measures were percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 24 months, length of stay and postoperative morbidity. Propensity score analysis was used to account for differences between groups.

RESULTS:

A total of 155 (mean age 42.9 years ± 10.60; mean BMI 54.6 kg/m2 ± 4.53) underwent either the two-stage (n = 30) or single-stage procedure (n = 125) depending on preoperative fitness. At 6 months following LRYGB, there was a significant difference in %TWL between the groups in a matched analysis (11.9% vs 23.7%, p < 0.001). At 24 months, there was no difference in %TWL (32.0% vs 34.7%, p = 0.13). Median hospital stay following LRYGB was 2.0 (1-4) days with the two-stage vs 2.0 (0-14) days for the single-stage approach (p = 0.75). There was also no significant difference in complication rates (p = 0.058) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no difference in weight loss after one or two-stage procedures in the treatment of patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 super obesity in a propensity score weighted analysis at 24 months. Length of stay and perioperative complications were similar for high risk patients; however, the two-stage approach was associated with delayed weight loss. Single-stage management is recommended for moderate risk patients, particularly with significant metabolic disorders, whilst two-stage approach is a safe and feasible pathway for high risk individuals.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido