Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.
Ibrahim, Bridget Basile; Vedam, Saraswathi; Illuzzi, Jessica; Cheyney, Melissa; Kennedy, Holly Powell.
Afiliación
  • Ibrahim BB; Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, CT, United States of America.
  • Vedam S; Department of Family Practice, Birth Place Lab, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Illuzzi J; Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
  • Cheyney M; Anthropology Department, School of Language, Culture and Society, College of Liberal Arts, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
  • Kennedy HP; Department of Midwifery, Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, CT, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0274790, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36137150
OBJECTIVE: High-quality, respectful maternity care has been identified as an important birth process and outcome. However, there are very few studies about experiences of care during a pregnancy and birth after a prior cesarean in the U.S. We describe quantitative findings related to quality of maternity care from a mixed methods study examining the experience of considering or seeking a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the U.S. METHODS: Individuals with a history of cesarean and recent (≤ 5 years) subsequent birth were recruited through social media groups to complete an online questionnaire that included sociodemographic information, birth history, and validated measures of respectful maternity care (Mothers on Respect Index; MORi) and autonomy in maternity care (Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making Scale; MADM). RESULTS: Participants (N = 1711) representing all 50 states completed the questionnaire; 87% planned a vaginal birth after cesarean. The most socially-disadvantaged participants (those less educated, living in a low-income household, with Medicaid insurance, and those participants who identified as a racial or ethnic minority) and participants who had an obstetrician as their primary provider, a male provider, and those who did not have a doula were significantly overrepresented in the group who reported lower quality maternity care. In regression analyses, individuals identified as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) were less likely to experience autonomy and respect compared to white participants. Participants with a midwife provider were more than 3.5 times more likely to experience high quality maternity care compared to those with an obstetrician. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight inequities in the quality of maternal and newborn care received by birthing people with marginalized identities in the U.S. They also indicate the importance of increasing access to midwifery care as a strategy for reducing inequalities in care and associated poor outcomes.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Materna / Partería Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Materna / Partería Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child / Female / Humans / Male / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos