Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Methylprednisolone for Lung Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Fu, Xi; Ye, Xin; An, Li-Na; Jiang, Hua; Huang, Wen-Bo; Huang, Ya; Dong, Jing; Ren, Yi-Feng.
Afiliación
  • Fu X; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
  • Ye X; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China. klpkyx@sina.cn.
  • An LN; Outpatient Department of Western Theater, Command General Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Jiang H; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
  • Huang WB; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
  • Huang Y; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
  • Dong J; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China. jean7dj960@gmail.com.
  • Ren YF; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China. ryftcm.dr@yahoo.com.
Pain Ther ; 12(1): 165-186, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36260278
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The administration of methylprednisolone (MP) is a component of perioperative multimodal analgesia that mitigates the potentially deleterious effects of postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, a systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of MP is lacking. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to quantify the potential clinical benefits and risks of perioperative MP in lung surgery.

METHODS:

We searched seven electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MP with placebo. Coprimary outcomes were rest pain scores, dynamic pain scores, and cumulative morphine equivalent consumption within 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS:

A total of 11 trials including 643 participants were selected for our meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the MP group had a significant difference in coprimary outcomes (rest pain scores, dynamic pain scores, and cumulative morphine equivalent consumption) compared with the placebo group; nevertheless, the improvement was not clinically meaningful based on minimum clinically important differences (MCID). Notably, MP administration reduced serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6 at 6 h (weighted mean difference -20.49 pg/mL; 95% CI -29.94 to -11.04), and decreased the incidence rate of acute lung injury (rate ratio 0.18; 95% CI 0.03-0.98) and cognitive dysfunction (rate ratio 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.88) compared with the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings suggest that the administration of MP contributed to an insignificant relief in acute postoperative pain for lung surgery in a clinical setting. Future studies should focus on exploring the role of MP in reducing pulmonary and surgical-related complications after lung surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER PROSPERO registration number CRD42022314224.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China