Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attitudes of Australians with inflammatory arthritis to biologic therapy and biosimilars.
Quinlivan, Alannah; Lester, Susan; Barrett, Claire; Whittle, Samuel; Rowett, Debra; Black, Rachel; Chand, Vibhasha; Marine, Franca; March, Lyn; Sinnathurai, Premarani; Buchbinder, Rachelle; Hill, Catherine.
Afiliación
  • Quinlivan A; Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
  • Lester S; Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
  • Barrett C; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Whittle S; Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, QLD, Australia.
  • Rowett D; Discipline of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Black R; Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
  • Chand V; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Brisbane, VIC, Australia.
  • Marine F; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC, Australia.
  • March L; UniSA Clinical and Health Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Sinnathurai P; Drug and Therapeutics Information Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Daw Park, SA, Australia.
  • Buchbinder R; Rheumatology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.
  • Hill C; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Rheumatol Adv Pract ; 6(3): rkac099, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36424984
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To investigate the knowledge and beliefs of Australian patients with inflammatory arthritis regarding biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) and biosimilars and their sources of information.

Methods:

Participants enrolled in the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD) with RA, PsA and axial SpA were sent an online survey. They were asked about information sources for b/tsDMARDs and how positive or negative this information was. The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) was used to measure beliefs about b/tsDMARDs with scores ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Participants were asked about their knowledge of biosimilars and willingness to switch to biosimilar.

Results:

There was a response rate of 66% (994/1498; 67% female, median age 62 years). Participants currently taking b/tsDMARDs (n = 794) had a high b/tsDMARD-specific BMQ 'necessity' score {median 4.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 3.6-4.8]}, with a lower specific 'concerns' score [median 2.4 (IQR 2.0- 3.0)]. Participants consulted multiple information sources [median 3 (IQR 2-5)]. Positive sources were rheumatologists and educational websites and negative were chat rooms and social media. Only 18% were familiar with biosimilars, with half knowing of availability in Australia. Following a short paragraph describing biosimilars, 75% (744) of participants indicated they would consider switching if recommended by their rheumatologist, with nearly half identifying safety and efficacy of biosimilars as an important concern.

Conclusion:

Australian patients have positive attitudes towards b/tsDMARDs overall, although little knowledge of biosimilars specifically. They have a high degree of trust in their rheumatologist regarding treatment decisions, even if they are unfamiliar with the medication recommended.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatol Adv Pract Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatol Adv Pract Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia