Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development - how, what, why and when?
Labib, Krishma; Pizzolato, Daniel; Stappers, Pieter Jan; Evans, Natalie; Lechner, Iris; Widdershoven, Guy; Bouter, Lex; Dierickx, Kris; Bergema, Katinka; Tijdink, Joeri.
Afiliación
  • Labib K; Amsterdam University Medical Centers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Pizzolato D; Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Stappers PJ; ID-StudioLab, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Evans N; Amsterdam University Medical Centers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lechner I; Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Widdershoven G; Amsterdam University Medical Centers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bouter L; Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dierickx K; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bergema K; Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Tijdink J; Zwaluw | Innovation & Collaboration & VanWaarde, The Netherlands.
Account Res ; : 1-26, 2023 Jan 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36472097
Existing research integrity (RI) guideline development methods are limited in including various perspectives. While co-creation methods could help to address this, there is little information available to researchers and practitioners on how, why and when to use co-creation for developing RI guidelines, nor what the outcomes of co-creation methods are. In this paper, we aim to address this gap. First, we discuss how co-creation methods can be used for RI guideline development, based on our experience of developing RI guidelines. We elaborate on steps including preparation of the aims and design; participant sensitization; organizing and facilitating workshops; and analyzing data and translating them into guidelines. Secondly, we present the resulting RI guidelines, to show what the outcome of co-creation methods are. Thirdly, we reflect on why and when researchers might want to use co-creation methods for developing RI guidelines. We discuss that stakeholder engagement and inclusion of diverse perspectives are key strengths of co-creation methods. We also reflect that co-creation methods have the potential to make guidelines implementable if followed by additional steps such as revision working groups. We conclude that co-creation methods are a valuable approach to creating new RI guidelines when used together with additional methods.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Account Res Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Account Res Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos