Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Role of adjuvant therapy in intermediate-risk cervical cancer patients - Subanalyses of the SCCAN study.
Cibula, David; Akilli, Huseyin; Jarkovsky, Jiri; van Lonkhuijzen, Luc; Scambia, Giovanni; Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu; Ortiz, David Isla; Falconer, Henrik; Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R; Odetto, Diego; Klát, Jaroslav; Dos Reis, Ricardo; Zapardiel, Ignacio; Di Martino, Giampaolo; Presl, Jiri; Laky, Rene; López, Aldo; Weinberger, Vit; Obermair, Andreas; Pareja, Rene; Poncová, Renata; Mom, Constantijne; Bizzarri, Nicolò; Borcinová, Martina; Aslan, Koray; Salcedo Hernandez, Rosa Angélica; Fons, Guus; Benesová, Klára; Dostálek, Lukás; Ayhan, Ali.
Afiliación
  • Cibula D; Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: dc@davidcibula.cz.
  • Akilli H; Baskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Jarkovsky J; Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • van Lonkhuijzen L; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Scambia G; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
  • Meydanli MM; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Ortiz DI; Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico.
  • Falconer H; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Abu-Rustum NR; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
  • Odetto D; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Klát J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
  • Dos Reis R; Department of Gynecological Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Zapardiel I; Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
  • Di Martino G; Gynaecologic Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital,University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
  • Presl J; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
  • Laky R; Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • López A; Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru.
  • Weinberger V; University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Obermair A; Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer; The University of Queensland, Australia.
  • Pareja R; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Poncová R; Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Mom C; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Bizzarri N; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
  • Borcinová M; Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Aslan K; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Salcedo Hernandez RA; Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico.
  • Fons G; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Benesová K; Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Dostálek L; Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Ayhan A; Baskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Gynecol Oncol ; 170: 195-202, 2023 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36706646
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The "intermediate-risk" (IR) group of early-stage cervical cancer patients is characterized by negative pelvic lymph nodes and a combination of tumor-related prognostic risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion. However, the role of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adjuvant (chemo)radiation is associated with a survival benefit after radical surgery in patients with IR cervical cancer.

METHODS:

We analyzed data from patients with IR cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm plus LVSI OR tumor size >4 cm; N0; no parametrial invasion; clear surgical margins) who underwent primary curative-intent surgery between 2007 and 2016 and were retrospectively registered in the international multicenter Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) study.

RESULTS:

Of 692 analyzed patients, 274 (39.6%) received no adjuvant treatment (AT-) and 418 (60.4%) received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (AT+). The 5-year disease-free survival (83.2% and 80.3%; PDFS = 0.365) and overall survival (88.7% and 89.0%; POS = 0.281) were not significantly different between the AT- and AT+ groups, respectively. Adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit after adjusting for confounding factors by case-control propensity score matching or in subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥4 cm and <4 cm. In univariable analysis, adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not identified as a prognostic factor in any of the subgroups (full cohort PDFS = 0.365; POS = 0.282).

CONCLUSION:

Among patients with IR early-stage cervical cancer, radical surgery alone achieved equal disease-free and overall survival rates to those achieved by combining radical surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article