Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder.
de Ridder, Jeroen; Bouter, Lex; Haven, Tamarinde; Peels, Rik; Tijdink, Joeri; Zeegers, Maurice P.
Afiliación
  • de Ridder J; Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Bouter L; Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Haven T; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Peels R; Danish Centre for Studies in Research & Research Policy, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Tijdink J; Department of Philosophy & Faculty of Religion and Theology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Zeegers MP; Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Account Res ; 30(5): 276-283, 2023 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36708135
We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Códigos de Ética Límite: Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Account Res Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Códigos de Ética Límite: Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Account Res Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos