Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Therapeutic and Economic Benefits of Service Dogs Versus Emotional Support Dogs for Veterans With PTSD.
Richerson, Joan T; Wagner, Todd H; Abrams, Thad; Skelton, Kelly; Biswas, Kousick; Illarmo, Samantha; McSherry, Frances; Fallon, Michael T; Frakt, Austin; Pizer, Steven; Magruder, Kathryn M; Groer, Shirley; Dorn, Patricia A; Huang, Grant D; Stock, Eileen M.
Afiliación
  • Richerson JT; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Wagner TH; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Abrams T; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Skelton K; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Biswas K; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Illarmo S; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • McSherry F; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Fallon MT; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Frakt A; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Pizer S; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Magruder KM; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Groer S; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Dorn PA; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Huang GD; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
  • Stock EM; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Nashville (Richerson); VA Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California (Wagner, Illarmo); Center for Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, VA Iowa City Healthcare System, and De
Psychiatr Serv ; 74(8): 790-800, 2023 08 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718602
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This work aimed to assess the therapeutic and economic benefits of service dogs versus emotional support dogs for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

METHODS:

Veterans with PTSD (N=227) participating in a multicenter trial were randomly assigned to receive a service or emotional support dog; 181 veterans received a dog and were followed up for 18 months. Primary outcomes included overall functioning (assessed with World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale II [WHODAS 2.0]) and quality of life (Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey [VR-12]). Secondary outcomes included PTSD symptoms (PTSD Checklist for DSM-5), suicidal ideation, depression, sleep quality, health care costs and utilization, medication adherence, employment, and productivity.

RESULTS:

Participants paired with a dog had a mean±SD age of 50.6±13.6 years (range 22-79), and most were male (80%), White (66%), and non-Hispanic (91%). Adjusted linear mixed repeated-measures models indicated no difference between the two groups on WHODAS 2.0 or VR-12 scores. Participants with service dogs had a 3.7-point greater reduction in PTSD symptoms versus participants with emotional support dogs (p=0.036). No reduced health care utilization or cost was associated with receiving a service dog. Veterans with service dogs had an increase of 10 percentage points in antidepressant adherence compared with those with emotional support dogs (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Both groups appeared to benefit from having a service or emotional support dog. No significant differences in improved functioning or quality of life were observed between the groups. Those in the service dog group had a greater reduction in PTSD symptoms and better antidepressant adherence, improvements that should be explored further.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático / Veteranos / Terapia Asistida por Animales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychiatr Serv Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático / Veteranos / Terapia Asistida por Animales Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychiatr Serv Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article