Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ex vivo experimental strategies for assessing unconstrained shoulder biomechanics: A scoping review.
Genter, Jeremy; Croci, Eleonora; Ewald, Hannah; Müller, Andreas M; Mündermann, Annegret; Baumgartner, Daniel.
Afiliación
  • Genter J; IMES Institute of Mechanical Systems, Zurich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, Winterthur, Switzerland; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: ge
  • Croci E; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Ewald H; University Medical Library, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Müller AM; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Mündermann A; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Baumgartner D; IMES Institute of Mechanical Systems, Zurich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Med Eng Phys ; 117: 104003, 2023 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37331756
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies of the shoulder often choose an ex vivo approach, especially when investigating the active and passive contribution of individual muscles. Although various simulators of the glenohumeral joint and its muscles have been developed, to date a testing standard has not been established. The objective of this scoping review was to present an overview of methodological and experimental studies describing ex vivo simulators that assess unconstrained, muscular driven shoulder biomechanics. METHODS: All studies with ex vivo or mechanical simulation experiments using an unconstrained glenohumeral joint simulator and active components mimicking the muscles were included in this scoping review. Static experiments and humeral motion imposed through an external guide, e.g., a robotic device, were excluded. RESULTS: Nine different glenohumeral simulators were identified in 51 studies after the screening process. We identified four control strategies characterized by: (a) using a primary loader to determine the secondary loaders with constant force ratios; (b) using variable muscle force ratios according to electromyography; (c) calibrating the muscle path profile and control each motor according to this profile; or (d) using muscle optimization. CONCLUSION: The simulators with the control strategy (b) (n = 1) or (d) (n = 2) appear most promising due to its capability to mimic physiological muscle loads.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hombro / Articulación del Hombro Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Med Eng Phys Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hombro / Articulación del Hombro Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Med Eng Phys Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article