Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation paste removal method and bond strength between resin cement and lithium disilicate ceramic: An in vitro study.
Pilecco, Rafaela Oliveira; Machry, Renan Vaz; Ribeiro, Vinícius Fogliato; Moraes, Rafael R; Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha.
Afiliación
  • Pilecco RO; Postgraduate student, Post-Graduate Program in Oral Sciences (Prosthodontics Units), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Machry RV; Postdoctoral student, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Ribeiro VF; Graduate student, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Moraes RR; Associate Professor, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
  • Pereira GKR; Adjunct Professor, Post-Graduate Program in Oral Sciences (Prosthodontics Unit), Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: gabriel.pereira@ufsm.br.
J Prosthet Dent ; 2023 Jun 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357087
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

After the use of evaluation paste, residue can remain on the bonding surface. However, how adhesion to lithium disilicate ceramic is affected is unclear.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effectiveness of lithium disilicate cleaning after contamination with an evaluation paste and before the application of a resin cement. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Rectangular lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) specimens were obtained with a simulated milled surface, crystallized, etched with 5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid, and contaminated with an evaluation paste. The cleaning methods tested were air-water spray (SPRAY), 37% phosphoric acid (HPO), ultrasonic bath (ULT), cleaning paste (IVOC), and a conventional surface treatment (HF + silane-HF+SIL). The control (CTRL) group was not contaminated. After silane had been applied, resin cement cylinders were fabricated and light polymerized. Half of the cylinders (n=56) were tested for microshear bond strength at baseline (24 hours), and the other half after 210 days of water storage and 25 000 thermal cycles. Surface roughness, failure analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests for surface roughness and the 2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests for bond strength (α=.05).

RESULTS:

At baseline, only SPRAY did not restore the bond strength compared with CTRL. After aging, the bond strengths of SPRAY and IVOC were lower than of CTRL (P<.05); no significant difference was found between CTRL, HPO, ULT, and HF+SIL (P>.05). EDS demonstrated the presence of carbon in the SPRAY and ULT groups, probably remnants of the evaluation paste. SEM analysis identified such remnants in the SPRAY group only.

CONCLUSIONS:

For optimal bond strength between lithium disilicate and resin cement after evaluation paste use, cleaning the ceramic surface with 37% phosphoric acid, ultrasonic bath, or with hydrofluoric acid worked best.

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil