Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Success of Xenografts in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Based on Histomorphometric Outcomes.
Khan, Rabia S; Aslam, Mohsin; Ucer, Cemal; Wright, Simon.
Afiliación
  • Khan RS; Department of Material Science and Engineering, Faculty of Science of Technology, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YR, UK.
  • Aslam M; ICE Postgraduate Dental Institute and Hospital, University of Salford, 24 Furness Quay, Salford M50 3XZ, UK.
  • Ucer C; ICE Postgraduate Dental Institute and Hospital, University of Salford, 24 Furness Quay, Salford M50 3XZ, UK.
  • Wright S; ICE Postgraduate Dental Institute and Hospital, University of Salford, 24 Furness Quay, Salford M50 3XZ, UK.
Dent J (Basel) ; 11(9)2023 Sep 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37754335
ABSTRACT
Different xenograft approaches in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) are essential to understand relative to their histomorphometric outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study involved studying biomaterials of a xenograft nature that are used in ARP procedures, to compare the different approaches and evaluate their efficacy in relation to histomorphometric data. An electronic search was completed using the databases Ovid (Medline), Google Scholar and Wiley Online Library, including a hand search for relevant articles and grey literature. Only randomised controlled trials, using xenograft biomaterials for alveolar ridge preservation procedures involving human studies, dated from 2010-2022 were included in the review. An initial search yielded 4918 articles, after application of the eligibility criteria, 18 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. The two main xenograft groups found were of bovine origin and of porcine origin. The main histomorphometric outcomes evaluated included new bone percentage (N.B%) and residual graft percentage (R.G%). The mean N.B% for the bovine and porcine groups were 33.46% and 39.63% respectively and the mean R.G% for the bovine and porcine groups were 19.40% and 18.63% respectively. The current evidence suggests that the two main xenograft biomaterials used in ARP procedures after tooth extraction, which are of bovine and porcine origin, displayed effectiveness in producing new bone.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Dent J (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Dent J (Basel) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido